Search Results for "Section 2(28)"

1012 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1012 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes GST Provisional Attachment Order for Violation of Natural Justice. Attachment of Bank Accounts and Property Without Prior Hearing Held Invalid Under Section 79(1)(c) of CGST Act, 2017.

The petitioner, Navin Vishwanathan, proprietor of M/s. Oriental Facility, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 300A of the Constitution of Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order in SARFAESI Act Matter — One Time Settlement Not Binding as Bank Did Not Accept Offer. Court Held That Mere Submission of OTS Proposal Does Not Create Binding Contract; Bank's Rejection Valid.

The petitioners, borrowers of the respondent bank, challenged the order dated 22.09.2022 passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal-I, Bangalore in Diary No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence and Incomplete Chain of Circumstances. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Mahesh Vasant Chilwante, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Osmanabad, in Sessions Case No.21/2015 for offences punishab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Criminal Revision Petitions Challenging Framing of Charges in Multiple Cases. Court holds that at the stage of framing charges, only a prima facie case is required and not a detailed evaluation of evidence.

The judgment involves a batch of criminal revision petitions filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in MCOC Act Case Due to Lack of Sufficient Material and Non-Application of Mind in Granting Approval and Sanction. Appellants Discharged Under Section 227 CrPC as Material on Record Did Not Warrant Framing of Charge Under MCOC Act.

The present appeals were filed by Sachin Bansilal Ghaiwal and Umesh Mohan Kirve, who were accused Nos. 3 and 9 respectively in a case registered under...