Search Results for "Partnership dispute"

1923 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1923 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Rent Control Case — Confirms Findings on Default, Subletting, and Bonafide Requirement. Tenants Failed to Comply with Section 15(3) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 and Unlawfully Sublet Premises.

The case involves a civil revision application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by the original defendants (tenants) chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Mutation Entries and Revenue Records in Land Dispute — Holds That Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title and Revenue Authorities Must Follow Natural Justice Before Making Entries Affecting Rights.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by individuals challenging mutation entries made in revenue records in respect of certain lands. The pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Rent Control Eviction Case, Restoring Trial Court's Order on Unauthorized Subletting. High Court's Revisional Interference Found Impermissible as It Reappreciated Evidence Beyond Jurisdictional Limits Under Section 46 of Karnataka Rent Act, 1999.

The dispute arose from eviction proceedings initiated by the landlord against the tenant, a partnership firm, under the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Injunction Against Defendant in Trademark Infringement Case — 'Cothagiri' Mark Deceptively Similar to 'Cothas'. Court Restrains Defendant from Using Mark 'Cothagiri' for Coffee Products, Finding Prima Facie Case of Passing Off Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The case involves a trademark dispute between M/s. Cothas Coffee Co. (plaintiff/respondent) and M/s. Avighna Coffee Pvt. Ltd. (defendant/appellant). T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Return of Plaint in Trespass Suit — Jurisdiction Must Be Decided on Plaint Averments, Not Evidence. The court held that under Order 7 Rule 10 CPC, a plaint can be returned only if the plaint itself shows lack of jurisdiction, not after a trial on evidence.

The appellant, Globe Theatres Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit in the Bombay City Civil Court for recovery of possession, injunction, and damages against the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Reverses Acquittal Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Under Section 139 N.I. Act Not Rebutted by Accused.

The appellant, M/s. Ajmera Housing Corporation, a partnership firm, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, again...