Search Results for "Maharashtra Excise"

882 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 882 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Notification Imposing Forest Development Tax under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 — Multiple Mining Companies Challenge the Levy as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws.

The matter involved a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by various mining companies, individuals, and an industry assoc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Bids in Tender Process for Supply of Medical Equipment. Court upholds rejection of bids as non-responsive for not meeting essential condition of being Original Equipment Manufacturer or authorized representative.

The petitioner, Larsen & Toubro Limited, filed two writ petitions challenging the rejection of their bids by the State of Maharashtra and the Project ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Inaction on GST Registration Cancellation Application — Failure to Consider Application Within Statutory Period Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Section 29 of CGST Act, 2017.

The petitioner, Heritage Lifestyles and Developers Private Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition before...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Section 498A IPC as Constitutionally Valid but Issues Guidelines to Prevent Misuse. The court held that the provision is not unconstitutional but requires safeguards against misuse through directions on arrest, investigation, and compounding of offences.

The Supreme Court in this batch of writ petitions and appeals considered the constitutional validity of Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Rule 17(2) of the PAN Rules, 2019 in GST Registration Cancellation Case. Rule requiring PAN Aadhaar linking for GST registration revival is intra vires the Finance Act, 2017 and not violative of Article 14 or Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Raju Laxman Pachhapure and Amit Pramod Minache, filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Promotion Quota Between Degree and Diploma Holders. Classification based on educational qualifications for promotion from Junior Engineer to Assistant Engineer is reasonable and not violative of Articles 14 and 16.

The petitioners, K.K. Bhaskaran and Sarjeet Singh, were working as Junior Engineers in the Electrical Department of the Administration of Union Territ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Demolition of Temple and Construction of Commercial Complex. Petitioners Failed to Establish Temple as Protected Monument Under Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958.

The petitioners, residents of Vaidya Wadi, Mumbai, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the demolition of a temple dedicated to Lord Hanuman...