Search Results for "Illegal gratification"

456 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 456 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Sets Aside Tribunal's Reinstatement Order - Upholds University's Compulsory Retirement of Junior Engineer for Serious Misconduct Under Maharashtra Universities Standard Code Rules

The High Court of Bombay allowed a writ petition filed by Petitioners challenging the University and College Tribunal's order that had set aside the c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Judicial Officer Discharged During Probation and Quashes Discharge Order. Discharge Based on Bail Order and Pending Inquiry Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice and Is Arbitrary Under Rajasthan Judicial Services Rules, 2010 and Article 233 of Constitution of India.

The dispute involved a judicial officer appointed as an Additional District Judge in 2013 under the Rajasthan Judicial Services Rules, 2010, who was d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Devidas s/o Harichandra Bhaskar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon on 26-11-2015 in Special (A.C.B.) Case No.13 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Tukaram Parshuram Mane, was convicted by the Special Judge, Gadhinglaj for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Cor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Nathaji Tukaram Lohakare, a Talathi (village revenue officer), was convicted by the Special Judge, Solapur, for offences under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand Verification and Inconsistent Evidence. Allegation of Bribe Demand Fails as Trap Witnesses Did Not Support Prosecution Case Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 23rd October 2012 passed by the Special Judge, Kolhapur acquitting the responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Prosecution Failed to Establish Demand and Acceptance of Rs. 800 Bribe Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the acquittal of Dnyanoba Wamanrao Jadhav, a Talathi, who was charged under the Prevention of Corrupt...