Search Results for "Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal"

479 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 479 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes FIR Against Bank Officials and BGR Energy Executives in Bank Guarantee Dispute -- No Criminal Intent Found in Commercial Transaction Under IPC Sections 420, 403, 406, 418, 425, 427 read with 34

The High Court quashed an FIR registered against bank officials and company executives alleging criminal offences in connection with bank guarantee tr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal by Union Bank of India in SARFAESI Act Matter — Endorsement Declining One-Time Settlement Not a 'Decision' Under Section 17(1) of SARFAESI Act, 2002. Writ Petition Challenging Bank's Endorsement Held Not Maintainable Due to Alternative Remedy Before DRT.

The case involves a writ appeal filed by Union Bank of India (appellants) against an order dated 02.05.2023 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Ka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Guarantor's Property — Maintains That Guarantor Is a 'Borrower' Under Section 2(1)(f) of SARFAESI Act and That Writ Jurisdiction Is Not Available When Alternative Statutory Remedy Exists Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act.

The petitioner, Mr. Latif Yusuf Manikkoth, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the possession notice issued by the Bank of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRAT Order Setting Aside DRT's Reference to Arbitration in Bank Recovery Suit. Arbitration Clause Does Not Oust Jurisdiction of DRT Under Section 19 of Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.

The petitioner, Harvestdeal Securities Ltd., challenged an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dated 19 February 2015, which set asid...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Borrower's Challenge to DRAT Order in SARFAESI Act Possession Dispute — Possession Notice Valid but Sale Notice Invalid. Bank Permitted to Proceed from Stage of Rule 8(5) of Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002.

The petitioners, M/s. Clarity Gold Pvt. Ltd. (borrower) and Mrs. Ganga Devi Gupta (guarantor and mortgagor), challenged an order of the Debts Recovery...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Section 7 Application for CIRP — Claimants Failed to Prove Debt and Default. The Tribunal held that the Appellants did not establish the existence of a financial debt or default, and the application was barred by limitation.

The present appeal was filed by Vistra ITCL (India) Limited, Pratiti Trading Private Limited, and Gajendra Investment Limited (Appellants) against the...