Search Results for "shortfall"

369 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 369 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Enforcing Negative Covenants in E-Sports Collaboration Agreement. Court Restrains Defendants from Associating with Competing Platforms and Disclosing Confidential Information Pending Trial.

The Plaintiff, Stoughton Street Tech Labs Pvt. Ltd., operates LOCO, an online live streaming and e-sports gaming platform. It entered into a Collabora...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Enforcing Negative Covenants in E-Sports Collaboration Agreement. Court restrains Defendants from associating with competing platforms and disclosing confidential information pending trial.

The Plaintiff, Stoughton Street Tech Labs Pvt. Ltd., operates LOCO, an online live streaming and e-sports gaming platform. It entered into a Collabora...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Counting Probationary Service as Qualifying Service for Pension — State Bank of India Employee's Probation Period Counts Towards Pensionable Service Under SBI Pension Rules.

The petitioner, Mrs. Sameedha Suhas Deshpande, was appointed as a Cashier-cum-Clerk in the State Bank of India (SBI) on 23rd October 1985, subject to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Suit for Specific Performance. Court upholds trial court's finding that plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform contract under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The petitioner, Mahesh Shambhulal Bhanushali @ Gori, proprietor of Vipul Octroi Centre, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 28/03/2022 p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Transfer Pricing Case Due to Non-Application of Mind by ITAT. Tribunal's order set aside for failing to consider the TPO's detailed analysis and rejecting comparables without proper reasoning under Section 92C of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appeal was filed by the Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax - 6 under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appe...