Search Results for "inconsistent testimony"

1703 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1703 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 498A and 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Bhimappa S/o Mallappa Bingi, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 498A and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Ocular Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by Mangesh Sadanand Masane and Sadanand Namdev Masane (original accused Nos. 1 and 2) against their conviction an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Teacher in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 10 and 12 of POCSO Act and Section 354-A IPC set aside as victim's testimony was not reliable and other witnesses turned hostile.

The appellant, Swadhinchandra Hariramji Zade, a teacher, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati in Sessions Trial No.295/2016 for of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witness Evidence. Property Dispute Led to Fatal Attack but Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 20th May 1995 passed by the learned IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Child Sexual Abuse Case Due to Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 509 IPC and Goa Children's Act, 2003 set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves two appeals filed by Suraj Nadkarni (Appellant No.1) and Dilesh Sambari (Appellant No.2) against their conviction by the Children's ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Police Head Constable in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the acquittal of Rajendra Dadaji Supare, a Police Head Constable, who was charged under Sections 7, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Milk Tanker Driver Established by Minor Son's Testimony. Court upholds award of Rs.1,65,000 to widow and children of deceased Kailashchandra under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The State of Maharashtra and other appellants appealed against the judgment and award dated 5 August 1995 of the Motor Accidents Claim Tribunal (MACT)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Jitendra Kumar Jain, was convicted by the Special Judge, Silvassa, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Pr...