Search Results for "executable decree"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "executable decree"

380 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 380 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Possession Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Ownership and Possession in Favor of Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. The Court Held That the Defendant Failed to Prove Adverse Possession and That the Suit for Possession Without Declaration Was Maintainable Under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

19 Feb 2026

The appellant, Bhavesh Jivraj Solanki, was the defendant in a suit filed by Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. (PGVCL) for recovery of possession of lan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Civil Court Decree in Tenancy Land Sale Dispute — Compromise Decree and Sale Deed Upheld as Valid. Transfer of Property Act Sections 41 and 51 Protect Bona Fide Purchaser from Ostensible Owner, and Civil Court Lacks Jurisdiction Under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 Sections 85 and 63.

6 Jul 2006

The case involves a dispute over agricultural land in Baramati. One Ramchandra Ganpat Daskul owned land in Survey No.91-A (14 acres 14 gunthas) and Su...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Disposal of Section 28A Applications Despite Pending Appeals in Land Acquisition Case. Landowners' Applications for Redetermination of Compensation Cannot Be Kept Pending Solely Due to Pendency of State's Appeals Against Reference Court Award.

7 Feb 2014

The petitioners were owners of lands acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. An award under Section 11 was made in 1988. In 1999, they filed ap...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Enhanced Compensation Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act Based on Lok Adalat Award. Lok Adalat Award Not an Award of Court Under Part III of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

24 Jun 2021

The petitioners' land was acquired by the State for a storage lake along with other lands. An award under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Appeal Against Admission of Contempt Petition and Framing of Charge — Holds That Order Admitting Contempt Petition Is Not Appealable Under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. The Court Found That the Impugned Order Was Interlocutory and Not Final, Hence the Appeal Was Not Maintainable.

11 Aug 2021

The case involves a contempt appeal filed under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, challenging an order dated 12.03.2018 passed by a lear...

High Court

High Court Quashes Lok Adalat Award in Motor Accident Claim Due to Lack of Claimants' Signatures on Settlement Memo. Lok Adalat Award Set Aside as Settlement Memo Not Signed by Claimants, Violating Section 20 of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, and Appeal Restored for Merits Hearing.

25 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a motor accident claim where the husband and father of the petitioners died in a road traffic accident. The Motor Accidents Cla...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Specific Performance — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Examine Attesting Witnesses and Handwriting Expert Under Section 68 of Evidence Act, 1872.

21 Aug 2015

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original plaintiffs (appellants) against the dismissal of their suit for specific performance of an agr...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Correctness of Order Directing Impleadment of Legal Heirs After Death of Partner in Two-Partner Firm. Court considers whether suit for recovery can continue without substituting legal representatives of deceased partner in light of automatic dissolution rule under Indian Partnership Act, 1932.

30 Jul 2026

Background: The matter arose out of a commercial suit filed by M/s Shiva Steel Supplies, a partnership firm, against M/s New Praveen Trailers, also a ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Chamber Summons by Judgment Debtor Challenging Execution of Foreign Award. Defendant Contends Hong Kong Labour Tribunal Award Not Executable as Hong Kong Not Reciprocating Territory and Tribunal Not Superior Court Under Section 44A of CPC.

3 Jul 2006

The matter arose from an execution application filed by Kevin George Vaz seeking to enforce an award dated 6th August 2004 passed by the Labour Tribun...

High Court

Bombay High Court Disposes of Cross Arbitration Petitions Challenging Copyright Royalty Award. License Fee and Infringement Claims Under Copyright Act, 1957 and Section 34 of Arbitration Act Evaluated.

31 Aug 2016

The Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. (IPRS), a copyright society registered under Section 33 of the Copyright Act, 1957, and Entertainment Network...

22 23 24 25 26

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)