Search Results for "enhancement without cross appeal"

804 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 804 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Sets Aside MACT Award in Motor Accident Claim Due to Fraudulent Suppression and Unexplained Delay; Insurer's Appeal Allowed and Claimants' Appeal for Enhancement Dismissed. Medico-Legal Case Procedures Under CrPC Sections 39, 174 Highlighted to Emphasize Need for Genuine Claims.

The two appeals before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, arose from the judgment and award dated 03.01.2018 in MVC No.1932/2017 by the X Add...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeal Against Trial Court's Damages Award in Illegal Termination Suit; Cross-Objection for Higher Damages Also Considered. Judgment Under Section 96 CPC and Order XLI Rule 1 is Delivered After Remand for Quantification.

This case involved the challenge to the termination of a managerial employee in a private limited company. H.R. Thimmappa Gowda joined Goetze (India) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Appeal Against Divorce Decree on Ground of Cruelty, Sets Aside Family Court Order. Isolated instances of verbal abuse and filing of false complaints do not constitute cruelty under Section 13(1)(i-a) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

The appellant-wife and respondent-husband were married on 20.5.1994 at Sumerpur, Rajasthan according to Hindu Vedic rites. After marriage, the wife re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused for Murder in Family Feud Case. Court acquits three other accused due to lack of evidence, finding that the prosecution failed to prove their involvement beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves two cross appeals arising from a judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, dated October 9, 1987, in Sessions Case No.84 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Reference in SLAO v. Gebilal and MCGM — Compensation Enhanced for Acquired Land. Court held that the Reference Court erred in reducing compensation without proper evidence and that the claimant is entitled to enhanced compensation based on comparable sales.

The case involves a land acquisition reference under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Special Land Acquisition Officer (SLAO) had awarded compensat...