Search Results for "Section 57(3)"

425 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 425 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Seeking Certificate Under Section 63AA of Gujarat Tenancy Act for Industrial Land Purchase. Rejection of Certificate Quashed as Petitioner Complied with All Conditions for Non-Agricultural Use.

The petitioner, Advance Greenfield Pvt Ltd, through its director Surendrakumar Netaram Sharma, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3388 OF 2024

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging DJR's Order in Co-operative Society Dispute. DJR Exceeded Jurisdiction by Re-appreciating Evidence in Disqualification of Defaulting Directors Under Section 152 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioner, Pravin Indarchand Jain, a member of Mahavir Nagari Sahakari Patpedhi Maryadit Chopda (Mahavir Society), filed complaints before the Di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction to Plaintiff in Copyright Dispute Over Film 'Sheela' — Prima Facie Finding of Valid Assignment Chain. Court holds that registered assignments under Section 48 of the Copyright Act, 1957 prevail over unregistered subsequent assignments.

The dispute concerns the copyright in the 1987 Hindi motion picture 'Sheela', originally produced by BS Dwarakish. Goldmines Telefilms Pvt Ltd filed a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Court Held That No Substantial Question of Law Arises When Both Lower Courts Concurrently Found That Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession.

The appellants (plaintiffs) filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of certain immovable property. The trial court d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Tax Superintendent in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Vijaykumar Marotrao Daiwalkar, was a Tax Superintendent in the Municipal Council, Chandrapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Tax Superintendent in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Vijaykumar Marotrao Daiwalkar, was a Tax Superintendent in the Municipal Council, Chandrapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Ch...