Search Results for "Pension Scheme"

685 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 685 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Regulation of Time Share Companies as Collective Investment Schemes Under SEBI Act. Court Holds That Time Share Arrangements Do Not Constitute Collective Investment Schemes and That Grievances Are Contractual in Nature.

The petitioner, M/s Securities & Time Share Owners Welfare Association, filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the Securities and E...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions of Retired Employees Seeking Pensionary Benefits Under Zilla Parishad and Jeevan Pradhikaran Rules. Court Holds That Prior Service as Daily Wagers Counts Towards Qualifying Service for Pension After Absorption.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by retired employees of the Zilla Parishad, Latur, and Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran. The petitione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Retired University Employees' Writ Petitions for Pension Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982. University employees who retired before adoption of Defined Contribution Pension Scheme are entitled to pension as per pre-amendment rules.

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by retired employees of Vasantrao Naik Marathwada Agriculture University, Parbhani, seeking pensionary...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Direction to Accept Late Pension Option in Exceptional Circumstances. Bank's Appeal Dismissed as Court Finds Employee's Lack of Knowledge Due to Being Abroad Justifies Condonation of Delay.

The respondent, Janak Raj Sharma, was a Senior Manager at Oriental Bank of Commerce who took voluntary retirement on 15.01.2001. On 23.08.2010, the Ba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions of Medical Officers Seeking Regularisation of Services Under ESIS. Held that the State Government's decision to terminate services of doctors appointed on contract basis in ESIS dispensaries was arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, a group of doctors, were appointed as Medical Officers on contract basis in the Employees State Insurance Scheme (ESIS) dispensaries ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Widow's Claim for Family Pension Despite Husband's Resignation — Resignation Does Not Forfeit Family Pension Under BSNL Pension Rules, 2007. Family pension is a separate benefit not affected by Rule 44(2) forfeiture clause.

The petitioner, Kalpana Bachhav, is the widow of Vinayak Tryambak Bachhav, who was employed as a T.M. (Telecom Mechanic) with Bharat Sanchar Nigam Lim...