Search Results for "Karnataka Land Revenue Act, Section 136"

280 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 280 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Revenue Entry and Notice Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy Under Karnataka Land Revenue Act. Petitioner directed to approach Deputy Commissioner under Section 136 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.

The petitioner, Smt. Rajeshwari W/o. Muttanna Biraj, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Rules on Stamp Duty Penalty: A Critical Examination of Section 34 of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957

The Supreme Court of India, in the case of Seetharama Shetty vs. Monappa Shetty, addressed the legal implications of Sections 33, 34, 37, and 39 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Petition to Quash FIR Against Bookies for Offences Under Karnataka Police Act and IPC. Allegations Pertain to Unauthorized Collection of Betting Amounts and Tax Evasion Within Bangalore Turf Club Premises.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed by twenty-six individuals or entities (th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Employer's Writ Petition Against Labour Court Order Allowing Workman's Claim for Full Wages under Section 33(C)(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Maintainability of an Individual Workman's Application after Settlement by Other Workmen Examined.

The petitioner, Mulberry Silks Ltd, a company engaged in silk fabric manufacturing, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constituti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notification Due to Inordinate Delay and Laches. Challenge to 1988 notification filed in 2017 held barred by delay and laches as no explanation for 29-year delay was provided.

The petitioners, owners of land in Thippasandra village, Bengaluru, challenged a preliminary notification dated 13.10.1988 issued under Section 4(1) o...