Search Results for "Additional director"

5877 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5877 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Leave India Notice by Australian Employee over Alleged Violation of Natural Justice and FRRO's Jurisdiction. Employment Visa Grant by High Commission Not Subject to FRRO's Nullification, Argues Petitioner.

The writ petition was filed by an Australian citizen, who held an Employment Visa (E-2) valid from 08.01.2018 to 07.01.2020, after being appointed as ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Tender Cancellation by TWAD Board — Holds That Cancellation Without Prior Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice and That Tender Conditions Must Be Strictly Construed.

The case involves multiple writ petitions filed by various contractors challenging the cancellation of a tender issued by the Tamil Nadu Water Supply ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rejects Second Bail Application in Economic Offence Case Due to No Change in Circumstances. Applicant's Role as Director in Fraudulent Transactions Upheld; Gravity of Offence Precludes Bail.

The applicant, Waryam Singh Kartar Singh, filed a second bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in connection wit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination Due to Abolition of Post in Government Company. Abolition of Post is a Management Decision Not Requiring Natural Justice, and Government Company Not 'State' Under Article 12 for Service Disputes.

The petitioner, Shri R.D. Avhad, was employed by the Maharashtra State Farming Corporation Ltd., a government company under the Companies Act, 1956, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Show-Cause Notice Under Customs Act — No Interference at Pre-Adjudication Stage. Section 28(11) of Customs Act, 1962 Upheld as Valid and Compensatory in Nature.

The petitioner, M/s. Royaloak Furniture India LLP, a furniture importer, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ...