Search Results for "railways act"

702 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 702 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed 'Untoward Incident' Under Section 123(c) of Railways Act, 1989. Station Master Memo Held Insufficient to Disprove Passenger Status When Valid Ticket Was Recovered.

The appellant, Suman Madhav Dhake, filed an appeal against the order of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Mumbai, which rejected her application for compen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed Accidental Fall Not Suicide. Death of a passenger falling from a train and being run over is an 'untoward incident' under Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989, and the railway is liable for compensation under Section 124-A.

The present appeal was filed by the appellants, Ramesh Laxmanrao Dighade and Mrs. Sindhu w/o Ramesh Dighade, being aggrieved by the judgment and award...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Termination of Contract in Railways Tender Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice. Contract Termination Set Aside as No Show Cause Notice Was Issued Before Termination Under General Conditions of Contract.

The petitioner, a contractor engaged in washing and ironing bedroll linen for the South Western Railways, was awarded a contract on 17.10.2022. Howeve...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Discriminatory Tender Conditions in Telecom Infrastructure Bid. Eligibility criteria requiring prior experience in road development and minimum turnover of Rs. 100 crores held arbitrary and violative of Article 14.

The petitioner, High-G Transmissions Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company registered as an Infrastructure Provider under the Indian Telegraph Act, 188...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Upholds Railway Claims Tribunal Award in Favour of Dependents of Deceased Passenger. Fall from Overcrowded Train Constitutes 'Untoward Incident' Under Section 123(c) of Railways Act, 1989, and Railway Administration is Liable for Compensation.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India (Railway Administration) against the judgment and award of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur Bench...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case. Claimant's Fall from Train Due to Jerk and Rush Constitutes 'Untoward Incident' Under Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989.

The Union of India, through the General Manager of South Central Railway, appealed against the judgment and award dated 21st September 2010 passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Case — Claimant Entitled to Compensation for Loss of Both Legs. Untoward Incident Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989 — Standing Near Door in Crowded Compartment Not Negligence.

The appellant, Ravichand Khurchankar, a 26-year-old student, was travelling by Howrah-Ahmedabad Express from Gondia to Nagpur on 7 July 2002. Due to o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Railway Freight Refund Case. Refund of Rs.25,197 with interest upheld as Railways wrongly applied minimum rate condition for train load under the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987.

The Union of India appealed against the judgment and order dated 28th June 1993 of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Bombay Bench, which directed the Railw...