Search Results for "raiding party"

392 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 392 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 19.0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witnesses and Lack of Proof of Demand. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Smt. Shobha Sonba Raut, was serving as Sub-Divisional Officer and Land Acquisition Officer at Osmanabad. The complainant, Dattatraya Ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sanjay s/o Ishwar Bhanushali, was convicted by the Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act) for Greater Mumbai for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42 of NDPS Act. Secret Information Not Reduced to Writing and Sent to Superior Officer, Rendering Search and Seizure Illegal.

The appellant, Shaikh Ibrahim Shaikh Usman, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon in Sessions Case (NDPS) No.11 of 2004 for an offe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Yuvraj Chintaman Selokar, was a senior clerk in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Aheri. He was convicted by the Special Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand Proof. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to establish demand of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Shriram s/o Timaji Chachane, was convicted by the Special Judge, Gondia in Special Case No. 3/93 for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Failure to Record Reasons for Belief and Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before a Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellant, Mohd. Akram Mohd. Majij Shaikh, was convicted under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) by the Special ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals of Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act. Conviction for Possession of Hashish Set Aside as Search and Seizure Were Conducted Without Proper Authorization and Without Informing Accused of Their Rights.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by Satyawan Pagi (A1) and Vimal Singh (A2) against their conviction and sentence under Section 20(b)(ii)(...