Search Results for "priority disposal"

372 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 372 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Expedited Divorce Proceedings, Upholds Judicial Autonomy and Refuses to Fix Time Limit for Family Court Disposal

The petitioner, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the III Additional Principal Judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Tribunal Order for Violation of Natural Justice in Occupancy Certificate Proceedings. Land Tribunal's order set aside as it was passed without notice to petitioners and without considering their objections under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

The petitioners, who are agriculturists, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 30.1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 467, 468, 302, 201 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of one S.V. Raghavan, who owned a house at No.239-B, 3rd A Main, 4th Block, HBR Layout, Bangalore. The prosecution all...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 302, 467, 468, 201 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Chandrakanth S. Sharma, Monto C. Sharma, and Smt. Harsha, were convicted by the 52nd Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Amendment to DCR 33(7) Appendix III for Lack of Locus Standi and Bonafides. Petitioner failed to establish any public interest or personal injury, leading to dismissal with costs.

The petitioner, Mr. Imran Suleman Qureshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging an amendment dated 21/05/2011...