KAHC010028192013_1
26 Sep 2014...
Search Results for "prerogative writ"
690 result(s) found
Found 690 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes No-Confidence Motion Notice Against Panchayat Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha for Non-Compliance with Section 49(2) of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 — Notice Issued Without Seven Days' Clear Notice Period and Without Specifying Date of Meeting.
3 Feb 2014The petitioners, Smt. Chandrakala and Smt. Bhagyamma, were the Adhyaksha and Upadhyaksha respectively of Makali Grama Panchayat in Ramanagara District...
- 48
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes One-Time Spectrum Charge on Cellular Operators for Spectrum Beyond 6.2 MHz, Holding No Statutory Power Under Telegraph Act, 1885 to Impose Retrospective Charges
8 Jun 2026The case involved a writ petition filed by major cellular mobile service operators, Bharti Airtel Limited and Vodafone Idea Limited, challenging the i...
- 33
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Deemed Conveyance Application Under MOFA — Holds That Competent Authority Cannot Reject Application on Grounds of Missing Documents After Issuing Notice, and That Lack of Occupation Certificate Is Not a Bar to Grant of Deemed Conveyance.
25 Nov 2024The petitioner, ALJ Residency Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the ...
- 1801
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Port Trust's Eviction Notices for Unauthorized Occupants. Held that lessees/licensees whose tenures expired and who continued in possession without consent are unauthorized occupants liable to eviction under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963.
12 Jun 2020The judgment concerns a group of writ petitions filed by various entities who were originally lessees or licensees of land belonging to the Board of T...
- 66
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Inquiry Officer's Penalty Order for Lack of Jurisdiction in Misdescription of Cargo Case. Container Corporation of India's Inquiry Officer acted without authority under the Indian Railways Act, 1989 and the Railways (Punitive Charges for Misdescription of Goods) Rules, 2004.
20 Feb 2015The case involves two writ petitions arising from an order dated 10.09.2012 passed by an Inquiry Officer, Shri Srinivas Mudgerikar, appointed by the H...
- 88
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging CBEC Circular on Brand Rate of Drawback. Court holds that an exporter can claim Brand Rate of drawback under Rule 7 of the Customs, Central Excise Duties and Service Tax Drawback Rules, 1995 even after availing All Industry Rate under Rule 3.
1 Sep 2014The petitioner, Alfa Laval (India) Ltd., filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a Circular dated 30th Decemb...
- 135
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Screening Criteria of Manohar Parrikar Goa Scholars Scheme — No Violation of Article 14 Found in Common Shortlisting for Postgraduate and Doctoral Applicants. The court held that the common criteria based on marks up to graduation were objective and reasonable, and the scheme did not require separate categorization for doctoral applicants.
6 Mar 2025The petitioner, Ms. Amanda Andrea Menezes, a doctoral student in Medicinal Chemistry at the University of Toledo, USA, challenged the screening criter...
- 342
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Disposes Common Judgment in 13 Writ Petitions Pertaining to Wrongful Non‑Regularization and Alleged Unfair Labour Practices. The Central Question Was Whether the Nagpur Municipal Corporation’s Conduct Toward Long‑Serving Safai Karmacharis Attracted Items 6 and 9 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971, and Entitled Them to Regularization Under the Model Standing Orders.
22 Dec 2025The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard a batch of 13 writ petitions arising from complaints under Section 28 of the Maharashtra R...
- 14
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages. Termination of workman without compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 held illegal, and reinstatement with full back wages upheld.
15 Nov 2017The petitioner, M/s. Carona Ltd., challenged the judgment and order of the Labour Court, Mumbai, dated 30th September 2016, in Reference (IDA) No. 156...
- 111
