Search Results for "pragmatic view"

587 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 587 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Petition Against Rejection of Section 264 Application for FBT Refund. Intimation under Section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is an assessment order for the purpose of revision under Section 264.

The petitioner, Hindalco Industries Limited, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 6 March 2019 passed by the Principal Chief Commissioner ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Petition to Quash Matrimonial Cruelty and Dowry Case. Husband Challenges Criminal Proceedings Alleging Vague Allegations and Abuse of Process.

The petition was filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of criminal proceedings pending in C.C.No.19072/202...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Whether Dearness Allowance is a Fundamental Right, Hears Appeals Against High Court Mandate to Pay Central Rates. High Court's declaration of Dearness Allowance under Article 21 and direction for parity with Central Government employees challenged by State.

The State of West Bengal filed appeals by special leave challenging the orders of the High Court at Calcutta dated 20th May 2022 and 22nd September 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Filing Appeal Against Conviction Due to Sufficient Cause. The court held that a liberal approach should be taken in condoning delay to allow the appeal to be heard on merits, especially when the delay is short and explained.

The applicant, Shiv Mandhukar Giri, was convicted in R.C.C. No.2156/2007 by the 5th Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Aurangabad, for an offence under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Zilla Parishad's Writ Petitions Challenging Industrial Court Orders After 8-Year Delay. Delay of 8 years and 1 month in challenging Industrial Court's judgment not satisfactorily explained; petitions dismissed on ground of laches and delay.

The petitioner, the Chief Executive Officer of Zilla Parishad Jalna, filed two writ petitions challenging the common judgment dated 19/12/2006 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employer Directed to Reinstate Employee with Back Wages. Abandonment of Service Claim Rejected as Employee Reported for Duty After Maternity Leave.

The present petition was filed by Finlay Mills challenging an order dated 4.12.2002 passed by the Industrial Court, Bombay in Complaint (ULP) No.169 o...