Search Results for "penalty under Excise Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "penalty under Excise Rules"

430 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 430 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955 in Assam Accord Challenge — Majority Holds Cut-off Date of 25.03.1971 for Regularisation of Immigrants Valid. The court held that the provision is a reasonable classification under Article 14 and does not violate Articles 6, 7, 29, 325, 326, 355, 356, or 368 of the Constitution.

17 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions and appeals, considered the constitutional validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act, 1955, which was i...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Section 498A IPC as Constitutionally Valid but Issues Guidelines to Prevent Misuse. The court held that the provision is not unconstitutional but requires safeguards against misuse through directions on arrest, investigation, and compounding of offences.

10 Mar 2025

The Supreme Court in this batch of writ petitions and appeals considered the constitutional validity of Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Extended Limitation Period Not Invokable Without Evidence of Suppression. CESTAT's finding that there was no misdeclaration or suppression of facts by the importer upheld, and the demand for differential duty beyond normal period was barred by limitation under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962.

21 Sep 2022

The Principal Commissioner of Customs (Import) filed an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 against an order of the Customs Excise and S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Assessment Orders Against Former Directors in GST Case — Personal Liability Cannot Be Imposed Without Shedding Corporate Veil. Directors Who Resigned Prior to Tax Period Cannot Be Held Liable for Company's Tax Dues Under MGST Act, BST Act, and CST Act Without Lifting Corporate Veil.

22 Aug 2022

The petitioners, Mukesh D. Ramani, Satish D. Sanghavi, and Prakash D. Sanghavi, were former directors of Twin City Organics Pvt. Ltd. They filed writ ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging CESTAT Order Rejecting Recall of Fraud Finding in CENVAT Credit Case. Court holds that CESTAT's finding of mis-statement and fraud was not a reviewable error and that the Tribunal had inherent power to impose costs for abuse of process.

25 Mar 2021

The petitioner, Essel Propack Limited, a company engaged in manufacturing plastic tubes, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Revenue Authorities in Stamp Duty Undervaluation Cases — Revisional Powers Under Section 47A of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 Upheld. The Court held that the limitation period for suo motu revision by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority is five years from the date of the order, not from the date of registration.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from orders of the Madras High Court concerning the interpretation of Section 47A of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Writ Challenging Service Tax Demand and Section 35F Validity — Petitioner Relegated to Alternate Remedy of Appeal. Constitutional challenge to Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944 not entertained as validity already upheld; factual disputes remitted to appellate authority.

10 Jan 2019

The petitioner, Tyresoles India Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 14 October 2016 passed by the Commissioner of Central Exci...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Input Service Credit on Repair of Company Vehicles and Rent-a-Cab Services Allowed. The court held that repair of company vehicles and rent-a-cab services used for transportation of staff/guests are eligible input services under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

2 Dec 2015

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Mangalore, against the final order No.21966/2014 passed by the Customs, Exci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Orders on Limitation Act Applicability to RDDBFI Act Appeals. Court Holds Section 5 of Limitation Act Applies to Appeals Under Section 30 of RDDBFI Act, Rejecting Petitioners' Argument That Special Statute Excludes Limitation Act.

13 Oct 2011

The petitioners, owners of apartments in Jupiter Complex, Nagpur, challenged orders of the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and Debts Recovery Appellate ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Levy of Additional Duty on Denatured Ethanol Under Maharashtra State Excise Duty Act, 1975 — Denatured Ethanol Held to be 'Spirit' and 'Intoxicant' Subject to Excise Duty. The court held that denatured ethanol is not excluded from the definition of 'spirit' under Section 2(24) of the Act merely because it is denatured, and the levy of additional duty under Section 24 is valid and constitutional.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by various companies engaged in the manufacture and sale of denatured ethanol, challenging the l...

21 22 23 24 25

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)