Search Results for "managing agents"

237 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 237 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Injunction Restraining Bank from Enforcing Corporate Guarantee. The court set aside the injunction as the guarantee deed was unconditional and the bank had a prima facie case under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC, enabling it to proceed under SARFAESI Act and IBC.

The appeal arose from an order dated 25.07.2024 passed by the LXXXV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (Commercial Court) in I.A. No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Property Suit — Suit Barred by Limitation and Res Judicata. Order VII Rule 11 CPC Application Allowed as Plaint Discloses No Cause of Action and is Time-Barred.

The present appeal was filed by the original plaintiff against the order of the trial court dated 01.10.2025 rejecting the plaint in Special Civil Sui...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Civil Procedure Code Case — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review Petition under Order XLVII Rule 1 read with Section 114 CPC fails as petitioner seeks re-argument on merits, not review of error.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, presided over by Hon'ble Mr. Justice S Sunil Dutt Yadav, delivered a CAV order on 16.12.2025 in Review Petit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Trial Court Order on Impleading Parties in Suit for Partition and Injunction — Upholds Order Allowing Impleading of Subsequent Purchasers as Necessary Parties Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.

The petitioner, H.P. Subbareddy, filed a suit for partition and permanent injunction in respect of certain immovable properties. During the pendency o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Application for Condonation of 1654 Days Delay in Filing Appeal Against Land Acquisition Award. Delay of 1654 days not sufficiently explained, and no case of substantial injustice made out to condone such inordinate delay under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The State of Maharashtra and its officers (applicants) filed a Civil Application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking condonation of a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Delay Condonation Applications in Land Acquisition Appeals — Limitation Act Section 5 Not Applicable to State for Delay Beyond 30 Days in Filing Appeals Under Section 54 of Land Acquisition Act.

The judgment pertains to multiple civil applications filed by the State of Maharashtra and its officers (the Executive Engineer, Minor Irrigation Divi...