ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.15468 OF 2026
17 Jul 2026The petitioner, Polestar Realtors Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim reli...
Search Results for "layout scheme"
805 result(s) found
Found 805 result(s)
High Court
Karnataka High Court Considers Quashing of FIR Alleging Extortion Racket in Electoral Bond Scheme. Former BJP State President Challenges Registration of Crime Under Sections 384, 120B, 34 IPC Based on Private Complaint.
3 Dec 2024The petitioner, a former Member of Parliament and State President of BJP, filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash FIR No. 224/2024 re...
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Company Directors in PF Embezzlement Case Due to Lack of Criminal Intent and Civil Nature of Dispute. Directors Not Vicariously Liable for Company's Failure to Deposit PF Amounts Under Section 14 of Employees' Provident Funds & Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 When Dispute Is Essentially Civil.
17 Jan 2024The petitioners, M/s. Edunetwork Private Limited and its directors Geetansh Bamania and Ajay Nain, filed a criminal writ petition under Articles 226 a...
- 49
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Development Charges Under U.P. Urban Planning Act, Quashes Other Levies as Unauthorized. The Court holds that only development fees under Section 15(2-A) are valid, while inspection fee, sub-division charges, stacking charges, and impact fee imposed via executive orders under Section 41 are ultra vires and violative of Article 265.
28 Apr 2023The Supreme Court disposed of a group of appeals arising from common judgment(s) of the Allahabad High Court concerning the validity of various demand...
- 345
High Court
High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Hears Petitions for Regularization of Services of Bangalore University Employees. Petitioners Sought Formal Orders of Regularization Pursuant to Government Directives and Earlier Court Orders.
28 Feb 2022Multiple writ petitions were filed by employees working in various capacities at Bangalore University. The petitioners sought regularization of their ...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Specific Performance Case — Assignment of Contractual Rights Requires Consent of Original Party. The Court held that assignees cannot enforce specific performance against original owners without their consent, as the original vendees' rights were extinguished by withdrawal of suit and cancellation of agreement.
25 Nov 2019The case involves four suits for specific performance filed by Respondent Nos. 1 (assignees) against the Appellants (original owners) based on agreeme...
- 172
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Unauthorised Construction — No Right to Regularise Illegal Construction by Payment of Fees. The Court held that payment of development charges does not condone unauthorised construction under Sections 44 and 53 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
29 Aug 2019The petitioner, Savitribai Phule Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, challenged a notice dated 9th March 2018 issued by the Solapur Municipal Corporation demand...
- 138
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Cooperative Society's Appeal Against Developer in Property Dispute — Interim Relief Denied Due to Lack of Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience. The court held that the society failed to establish a concluded contract as the development agreement was not signed by the developer, and the society had not paid full consideration, making damages an adequate remedy.
17 Dec 2011The appellant, Rachanaa Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of a development agreement against the respondent dev...
- 110
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Merger Control Disclosure Obligations and Limits of CCI's Powers After Approval. The Court Emphasizes That CCI's Authority Must Be Traced to the Act and That Disclosure Must Present the Transaction in Substance.
1 Jan 1970The case arises from an appeal under Section 53T of the Competition Act, 2002, filed by Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC before the Supreme Court...
- 26
