Search Results for "interim arbitral order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "interim arbitral order"

837 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 837 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Revision Petition Challenging Return of Section 34 Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction — Holds That Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Contract and Prior Section 9 Filing at Salem Confer Jurisdiction on Salem Courts Under Section 42 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

21 Apr 2026

The revision petitioner, Waterbury Farrel, a division of Magnum Integrated Technologies Inc., Canada, filed Arb.O.P.No.103 of 2019 before the Principa...

High Court

Arbitration Amidst Disputed Insurance Claims. Navigating jurisdictional challenges and contractual non-disclosure in arbitration under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

19 Dec 2024

A Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award for its alleged failur...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Patent Illegality and Perversity in Awarding Damages for Breach of Agreement for Sale of Land. The court found that the arbitral tribunal failed to consider mitigation of damages and made a perverse computation of damages based on an incorrect price per acre.

8 Jul 2022

The case involves a commercial appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Jagannath Parmeshwar Mills Private Limi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Petition Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Family MoU Binding on Shareholders. The court held that a family Memorandum of Understanding containing an arbitration clause constitutes a valid arbitration agreement, enforceable under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and binding on heirs and successors.

6 Apr 2021

The appeal arose from the dismissal of a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed before the High Court of Delhi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Development Agreement Dispute Between Cooperative Housing Society and Developer. Court Upholds Award on Termination of Agreement and Refund of Deposit but Sets Aside Directions for Possession and Appointment of Receiver.

7 Jan 2020

The judgment arises from two arbitration petitions and a notice of motion filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Enforcement Case — Upholds Arbitral Award Despite Conflicting Jurisdiction Clauses. Court Holds That Where Multiple Agreements Contain Different Arbitration Clauses, a Common Arbitrator Can Be Appointed with Consent, and the Award Is Not Liable to Be Set Aside Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

1 Jan 2020

The dispute arose between Quippo Construction Equipment Ltd. (appellant) and Janardan Nirman Pvt. Ltd. (respondent) concerning four agreements for hir...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cross Appeals in Part in Arbitration Dispute Over Interim Measures Under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court Clarifies That an Award Creditor Can Seek Interim Relief During Section 34 Proceedings to Secure the Award Amount.

31 Jul 2019

The case involves cross appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 arising from a common order dated 1 July 2019 passed by...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Execution of Foreign Decrees by Mauritius-Based Companies Against Indian Debtors Under Section 44A CPC. The court held that decrees from reciprocating territories are directly executable in India without a fresh suit, and the Commercial Division has jurisdiction over such applications.

26 Apr 2018

The judgment involves three execution applications filed by foreign decree holders (Global Asia Venture Company, Matrix Partners India Investment Hold...

High Court

Bombay High Court Disposes of Cross Arbitration Petitions Challenging Copyright Royalty Award. License Fee and Infringement Claims Under Copyright Act, 1957 and Section 34 of Arbitration Act Evaluated.

31 Aug 2016

The Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. (IPRS), a copyright society registered under Section 33 of the Copyright Act, 1957, and Entertainment Network...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Foreign Award — Part I of Arbitration Act Inapplicable. Section 34 petition under Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 held not maintainable for foreign award with seat in London.

20 Jan 2015

The appeal arose from an order of a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing the appellant's arbitration petition under section 34 of ...

21 22 23 24 25

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)