Search Results for "inconsistent testimonies"

460 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 460 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Abetment to Suicide Case — No Evidence of Instigation or Intent. Allegations of harassment and instigation under Sections 306, 354, 323, 504 IPC read with Section 34 IPC not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The State of Karnataka appealed against the judgment of acquittal dated 22.07.2017 passed by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Haveri (si...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. State's Appeal Dismissed as Trial Court's View Was Plausible Under Sections 376 and 376 read with 109 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of respondents Saifulla Mohammad Aktar Shaikh (A-1) and Sau. Sugara Mehemood Alam Sayyad (A-2)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Acquittal for Murder and Cruelty. Dying Declaration Found Unreliable and Prosecution Witnesses Inconsistent.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of three respondents (Sadhana Suresh Jadhav, Anusaya Dunda Jadhav, and Sunil Dunda Jadhav) for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 set aside as prosecution failed to prove last seen theory and recovery of weapon beyond reasonable doubt.

The appeal arises from the conviction of Rajendra Eknath Apugade and Arjun Vasant Falake (original accused Nos. 1 and 2) by the Additional Sessions Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Motive. Conviction under Sections 302 and 324 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Gelsing Pida Pawar, was convicted by the learned Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Amalner in Sessions Case No. 13 of 2006 for the offe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration — Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Eye-Witnesses Were Inconsistent and Motive Not Proven.

The appellant, Akalesh Kumar @ Mithun Sharad Mishra, was convicted by the Sessions Court for Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No.417 of 1996 with Sessi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Intent. Conviction under Section 307 IPC Set Aside as Injuries Were Not Life-Threatening and Common Intention Was Not Established.

The case pertains to an appeal against the judgment and order dated 5th December 2007 passed by the trial court convicting the appellants under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for assault with iron rod set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sanjay Laxman Chavan, was convicted by the Sessions Court for the murder of Mangesh Shaligram Patil under Section 302 IPC and sentenced...