Search Results for "exhaustive provisions"

1728 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1728 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Against IGST Demand of Rs.1524 Crores on Arbitration Award Damages. Issue Pertains to Whether Damages Paid Under Deemed Decree Constitute Consideration for Taxable Service Under IGST Act, 2017.

The dispute centers on a writ petition filed by Tata Sons Private Limited (Tata) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging an intima...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Multiple Appeals and Cross-Objections Challenging Compensation Awards in Land Acquisition Matters. The Court Determined Market Value of Lands Acquired for a Minor Irrigation Tank in Kakhandaki Village, Bijapur District.

In the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, a conglomeration of appeals and cross-objections under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 challenged the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Relief from Lis Pendens in Specific Performance Suit — Transfer of Property Act Section 52. Court allows defendant to be relieved from lis pendens upon deposit of Rs.8 lakhs, balancing plaintiff's claim with defendant's right to deal with property.

The appeal arises from a judgment of a learned Single Judge dated 13 September 2013 in a motion taken out by the Appellant, the original Plaintiff, du...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Bail Petitions and Refers Questions on POCSO Act to Division Bench. Single Judge observes conflicting views on Section 35 compliance and refers issues regarding default bail and evidence recording under Section 164 Cr.P.C., doubting Vinay v. State of Karnataka.

The case involved two criminal petitions filed before the Karnataka High Court by the accused, Hanumantha Mogaveera, seeking bail under Section 439 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Passed Judgment in Appeals Filed Under Section 54(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Court Considered Challenges by State and Landowners Against Reference Court's Compensation Determination for Lands Acquired for Minor Irrigation Tank.

The case involves multiple appeals and cross-objections filed under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and Order 41 Rule 22 of the Code ...