Search Results for "excess expenditure"

489 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 489 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Rehears Quashing Petition Against Lokayukta FIR for Disproportionate Assets After Supreme Court Remand; Petitioner Alleges Absence of Preliminary Enquiry and Non-Application of Mind by Superintendent of Police Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The petitioner, a Superintendent Engineer in the Public Works Department, Government of Karnataka, filed a writ petition under Article 226 read with S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Fee Regulation in Unaided Schools — State Has Power to Regulate Fees Under Maharashtra Education Institutes (Prevention of Capitation Fees) Act, 1987 to Prevent Capitation Fees and Profiteering.

The petitioners, an association of private unaided minority and non-minority schools running international curriculum schools, challenged the constitu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Tender Award in Municipal Contract Case for Violation of Tender Conditions and Lack of Transparency. The Court held that the Corporation's decision to award the contract to a technically disqualified bidder was arbitrary and unsustainable.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Kirloskar Brothers Limited (Maharashtra Electro-mech Joint Venture) challenging the tender process conducte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Determines Compensation in Land Acquisition References for MSRTC Bus Depot at Dahisar, Borivali. Comparable Land Sale Instances Analyzed to Fix Market Value Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

This matter involved a group of land acquisition references under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, filed by land owners whose properties ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Batch of Appeals Involving Transit Fee Levied by Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand and Madhya Pradesh Under Indian Forest Act, 1927. Appeals Arise from Differing High Court Decisions on Validity of Transit Rules Framed Under Section 41.

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of cases concerning the levy of transit fee on forest produce. The matter involved three States: Uttar Pradesh, Ut...