Search Results for "discovery statement"

1345 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1345 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 144, 148, 302, 504, 109 read with 149 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness's evidence was inconsistent and not supported by other witnesses.

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by eight accused persons against their conviction and sentence by the District and Sessions Judge, Bagalk...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Vishwas @ Guddu Rajesh Dahiwale, Kamlesh @ Kamya Kalidas Patil, and Suraj Raju Manwatkar, were convicted by the trial court for the mu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Multiple Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Evidence. Convictions under Section 395 IPC set aside as test identification parade was not conducted and recovery of stolen property was not linked to the accused.

The case involves multiple appeals against a common judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, convicting several accused for offences under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Brother Murder Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove motive, last seen theory, and recovery of weapon beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Shyam Vishnu Yadav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Osmanabad on 06.01.2017 for the murder of his brother Namdeo under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case involves three criminal appeals challenging the judgment of the Sessions Judge, Beed, in Sessions Case No. 37 of 2015, convicting the appella...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 set aside as prosecution failed to prove last seen theory and recovery of weapon beyond reasonable doubt.

The appeal arises from the conviction of Rajendra Eknath Apugade and Arjun Vasant Falake (original accused Nos. 1 and 2) by the Additional Sessions Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused in UAPA Case Due to Prolonged Incarceration and Weak Evidence. Bail was allowed as appellants were in custody for over four years without charges framed, and evidence under Sections 120B and 302 IPC and UAPA provisions was insufficient to deny bail.

The Supreme Court considered an appeal by two accused persons, identified as accused nos. 46 and 47, who were charged with offences under the Unlawful...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of Minor Girl - Upholds Conviction Under Sections 376, 302 IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and DNA Evidence Sufficient to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to the rape and murder of a 16-year-old girl on 5th September 2013. The victim, a student of ITI, was last seen by her mother at Asa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Credible Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 302 and 452 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Prakash Bhimashankar Bagle, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur, for the murder of Shaila Birajdar under Section 30...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence, Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal of Co-Accused. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC based on circumstantial evidence and last seen theory.

The case involves two appeals arising from the same judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangamner, in Sessions Case No. 27 of 2005. Criminal Ap...