Search Results for "damage certificate"

1041 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1041 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 307, 326, 324, 341 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Popat Bajirao Kotwal and Amol Popat Kotwal, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in Sessions Case No.244 of 2014 for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Resort Construction in CRZ Area. Petitioner failed to prove violation of CRZ Notification, 2011; court upholds administrative approvals.

The petitioner, Mohinder Kaur Paintal, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging the construction of a resort by Respon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Confirms Death Sentence for Accused in Rape and Murder of Four-Year-Old Girl. Conviction under Sections 302, 376(2)(i), 377, 363, 366, 201 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code Upheld for Acts Committed in Furtherance of Common Intention.

The case arises from a reference under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for confirmation of the death sentence and an appeal agains...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Acquittal in Criminal Appeal Against State — No Interference with Trial Court's Findings on Credibility of Witnesses and Lack of Evidence.

The State of Goa, through the Public Prosecutor, filed a Criminal Misc. Application No. 152/2005 along with a Criminal Appeal (Stamp No. 1450/2005) be...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Double Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by three accused persons, Madhesh (A1), Kalaivani (A2), and Prema (A3), against their conviction and sent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Admits Appeal and Reserves Judgment in Family Settlement Dispute. The Court Heard Arguments on Validity of Deed of Family Settlement Under Article 2042 of Family Laws, Estoppel, and Delay, but Final Verdict Not Extracted.

The case involved an appeal from order filed by the original defendants no.2 and 3 challenging the order dated 3.6.2016 passed by the Ad-hoc Senior Ci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Damages Suit Under Tamil Nadu Property (Prevention of Damage and Loss) Act, 1992 — Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Impliedly Barred. Section 7(4) of the Act Recognizes Concurrent Civil Remedy, Hence Suit for Damages Maintainable.

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court which set aside a decree for damages in favor of the appellant, M. Har...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Over 'Café Madras' Restaurant Name. The mark 'Café Madras' held to be inherently distinctive and entitled to protection against use by a subsequent restaurant of the same name.

The plaintiffs, the Kamath family, have been running a restaurant named 'Café Madras' in Matunga, Mumbai since 1938. The restaurant has acquired a re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Awards Compensation to Victims of Meerut Fire Tragedy Due to State and Organizer Negligence. State and Organizers Held Jointly and Severally Liable for Deaths and Injuries from Fire at Victoria Park Exhibition Due to Failure to Obtain Permissions and Ensure Fire Safety.

The Supreme Court dealt with a writ petition filed by victims of a fire tragedy that occurred on April 10, 2006, at Victoria Park, Meerut, during the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Constitutional Validity of Criminal Defamation Laws. The Petitioners Contend that Sections 499 and 500 IPC and Section 199 CrPC Violate Fundamental Right to Freedom of Speech and Expression Under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India.

The Supreme Court heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution, with Subramanian Swamy as the lead petitioner, challengi...