Search Results for "Pension Scheme"

685 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 685 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging Tribunal's Order Allowing Voluntary Retirement of Assistant. Rule 48-A of CCS Pension Rules Prevails Over Administrative Circulars and Fundamental Rule 56(k)(1) — Employer's Rejection on Grounds of Staff Shortage Held Arbitrary.

The Union of India and others (petitioners) challenged the order dated 01.03.2024 of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, which allowed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Pension to University Employee with 33 Years of Service Despite Temporary Appointments and Breaks. Continuous Service Under Rule 33 of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, Includes Temporary Service Followed by Confirmation.

The petitioner, a chemistry teacher, served Savitribai Phule Pune University from 1993 until her retirement on 30 April 2016, completing over 33 years...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Assistant Teacher in Private Aided School — Violation of Natural Justice and Section 5 of M.E.P.S. Act, 1977. Termination order set aside as no prior approval was obtained from the Education Officer before dismissal.

The petitioner, Vijaykumar Raosaheb Kulkarni, was an assistant teacher employed by the Rasta Peth Education Society, which runs a private aided school...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Widow's Family Pension Claim Under CRPF Rules — Liberal Interpretation of 'Family' Includes Widow Despite Husband's Remarriage. The Court held that the definition of 'family' under Rule 5 of CRPF Rules, 1971 includes the first wife, and denial of pension would be unjust.

The petitioner, Smt. Ranjana w/o Bhaskar Anasane, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) seeking family pension as the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Pension Claim of Former Government Employees Absorbed in VSNL. Pensionary benefits under Office Memorandum dated 5 July 1989 not applicable to employees who opted for absorption in VSNL and received benefits under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme.

The petitioners, former employees of the Department of Overseas Communication Services (OCS) of the Government of India, were absorbed into Videsh San...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Pension and Retiral Benefits to Municipal Employee Based on Standing Committee Resolution. The court directed the Aurangabad Municipal Corporation to pay full pension and retiral benefits as per Standing Committee Resolution No. 106/09 dated 18th August 2009.

The petitioner, Dattatray S/o Anandgir Giri, was employed as a Ward Officer with the Aurangabad Municipal Corporation. He was suspended on 7th August ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Freedom Fighter Pension Due to Suppression and Delay. Petitioner failed to disclose earlier inquiry report and filed petition after 14 years without explanation.

The petitioner, Devidas Vishwanath Chauthmal, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the grant of freedom fighter's pension to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Employees Seeking Pension Under Siemens Employees' Superannuation Fund Scheme. Employees Who Resigned Voluntarily Before Completion of Five Years of Service After Scheme's Introduction Not Entitled to Pension Benefits.

The case involves an appeal by 12 employees of Siemens Limited against a judgment of a single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 24.4.2003, which se...