Search Results for "Palghar"

242 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 242 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MPCB Closure Order for Violation of Environmental Norms. Petitioner's failure to obtain valid consent to operate under Water and Air Acts justifies closure for operating without environmental clearance.

The petitioner, Green Gene Enviro Protection and Infrastructure Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Approval for Shikshan Sevak Appointment. Education Officer's order set aside for non-application of mind and failure to consider that the post was vacant and the petitioner was duly qualified.

The petitioner, Mahadev Jagannath Bhosale, was appointed as a Shikshan Sevak on a vacant post by the management of Seva Ashram Vidyalaya. After comple...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Rejects Application for Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Agreement for Sale Not Concluded Contract but Continuous Offer, Plaint Discloses Cause of Action.

The appellant, M/s. Everhome Properties Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 15.07.2019 against the respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Insurance Dispute Despite Discharge Voucher. Dispute as to Quantum Under Fire Insurance Policy Referred to Arbitration Under Clause 13 of Standard Fire and Special Perils Policy.

The applicant, MIRC Electronics Ltd., filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of a so...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Review Application in Medical Officer Seniority Dispute. Seniority of Medical Officers appointed prior to 2008 is governed by the 2001 Recruitment Rules, not the 2008 Rules, and the State cannot alter seniority after finalization.

The case involves a dispute over the seniority of Medical Officers in Maharashtra. The original petitioners (respondents 1-6) were appointed as Medica...