Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Filed by Public Trusts and Residents in Ghatkopar. The Petition Concerns Land Use and Alleged Violations Under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950.
30 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act 1888"
422 result(s) found
Found 422 result(s)
High Court
Dispute over Transferable Development Rights and Incentive Benefits under Development Control Regulations.
16 Aug 2024The case involves Bholenath Developers Ltd. challenging the denial of additional Transferable Development Rights (TDR) benefits by the Municipal Corpo...
- 488
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Interim Injunction Against Demolition of Suit Structure in Municipal Corporation Dispute. Court Restrains Corporation from Demolishing Alleged Unauthorised Construction Pending Suit, Holding That Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience Favour Plaintiffs.
28 Feb 2022The case involves two appeals filed by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (defendant no.1) and M/s. Chhaya Construction Company (defendant no...
- 32
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Rule 18 of Capital Value Rules for Exceeding Delegated Authority Under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. Commissioner's Power to Frame Rules Under Section 154(1B) Does Not Extend to Imposing Additional Tax Liability Beyond the Act's Framework.
20 Jul 2018The petitioners, Aegis Logistics Limited and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging Rule 18 of the ...
- 58
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Telecom Tower Installation in Residential Area Under Section 419 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 — Municipal Corporation Cannot Refuse Permission Based on Unauthorized Policy Restricting Towers in Residential Zones. Held that the power to grant permission under Section 419 is quasi-judicial and must be exercised reasonably, and a blanket ban on telecom towers in residential areas is ultra vires the Act.
26 Sep 2017The petitioner, Bharti Airtel Limited, a telecom service provider, sought permission from the Mira Bhayandar Municipal Corporation to install a teleco...
- 56
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Limitation Ruling in Municipal Election Dispute — Election Petition Filed Within 15 Days of Gazette Publication Under Section 33 of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. The Court held that the limitation period for filing an election petition under Section 33 of the Act commences from the date of publication of the list of elected candidates in the Government Gazette, not from the date of declaration of result in Form 21K.
9 Feb 2015The petitioner, Smita Subhash Sawant, was declared elected as a Councillor from Ward No. 76 in the General Election of 2012 for the Bruhan Mumbai Muni...
- 164
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Cooperative Housing Societies Challenging Police Station Construction on Amenity Plot. Construction of Police Station on Reserved Amenity Plot Upheld as Valid Public Purpose Under MRTP Act and DCR.
28 Feb 2012The petitioners, three cooperative housing societies registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, filed a writ petition challengi...
- 115
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Eviction Orders in Municipal Market License Dispute — Appeals Held Not Maintainable Under Section 105B of BMC Act, 1888. The court held that eviction orders not passed under Section 105B of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 are not appealable, and the City Civil Court correctly rejected the appeals.
11 Jun 2010The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by licensees of dry fish stalls in Chhatrapati Shivaji M...
- 43
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Property Tax Attachment After Auction Sale by Official Liquidator. Property purchased through auction by Official Liquidator cannot be attached by Municipal Corporation for pre-sale tax arrears under Section 146 of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888.
16 Sep 2005The petitioners, Anchor Health & Beauty Care Ltd. and Deepak & Co., purchased immovable property of M/s. Nihon Electronics Ltd. (in liquidation) throu...
- 79
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Municipal Demolition Order — Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Notice. Court sets aside demolition of commercial structure under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, holding that no prior notice or opportunity of hearing was given to the appellant.
30 Nov -0001The appellant, M/s. Afsana Enterprises, a proprietorship firm, filed an appeal against an order of the Assistant Municipal Commissioner and others, ch...
- 87
