Search Results for "Karnataka Land Revenue Act, Section 136"

276 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 276 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Revenue Entry and Notice Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy Under Karnataka Land Revenue Act. Petitioner directed to approach Deputy Commissioner under Section 136 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.

The petitioner, Smt. Rajeshwari W/o. Muttanna Biraj, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Rules on Stamp Duty Penalty: A Critical Examination of Section 34 of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957

The Supreme Court of India, in the case of Seetharama Shetty vs. Monappa Shetty, addressed the legal implications of Sections 33, 34, 37, and 39 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Review Petition under Section 114 r/w Order 47 Rule 1 CPC fails as petitioners seek re-argument on merits, not correction of error.

The review petition was filed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer and the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board (KIADB) seeking review of an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Suit for Permanent Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that findings of fact recorded by courts below based on evidence cannot be disturbed in appeal under Section 96 CPC unless perverse or contrary to material on record.

The case involves a Regular First Appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2010 passed by the Senior Ci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Metro Fare Hike; Judicial Review Not Permitted Over Specialist Committee's Decision Under Metro Act. Fare Fixation Committee's Determination Based on Section 34 Prevails Over Contractual Fare Stipulations, Limited to Checking Arbitrariness or Perversity.

The writ petition challenged the Fare Fixation Committee's decision to increase Mumbai Metro fares from Rs.9-13 to Rs.10-110 from January 2015. The pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reviews Its Own Judgment That Struck Down Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearance Notifications Under Environment (Protection) Act. Review Petition Seeks Recall Citing Overlooked Binding Precedents.

Background: The present matter is a review petition arising from the Supreme Court's judgment in Vanashakti v. Union of India, dated 16 May 2025, whic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence of 26/11 Terrorist in Mumbai Attacks Case. Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal of Co-Accused Due to Insufficient Evidence, Finding No Perversity in Trial Court's Decision.

The Supreme Court dealt with appeals arising from the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks. The appellant, Mohammed Ajmal Kasab, a Pakistani national, was conv...