Search Results for "Intellectual Property"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Intellectual Property"

285 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 285 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Plaintiff's Registered Mark 'STREAX' Protected Against Deceptively Similar Mark 'STREAK Street' Used for Hair Products. The court found the defendants' adoption dishonest and the marks phonetically similar, warranting restraint pending trial.

5 Mar 2025

The plaintiff, Hygienic Research Institute Private Limited, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the defendants, Chandan an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes VAT Assessment Order for FY 2013-14 Against Luxembourg-Based Companies Due to Gross Violation of Natural Justice and Backdating of Order. Assessment order found to be pre-dated and based on no notice or hearing, rendering it null and void.

17 Oct 2024

The petitioners, comprising two Luxembourg-based companies (Petitioners 1 and 2) and their Indian group company (Petitioner 3), challenged an assessme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Restrains Defendant from Using Deceptively Similar Mark 'Shubhlaxmi Chiwda Mahalaxmi'. The Court modified the interim injunction to allow the defendant to use 'Shubhlaxmi Chiwda' with a blue background, subject to an undertaking, while restraining the use of 'Mahalaxmi'.

3 Sep 2024

The present Commercial Appeal from Order was filed by the appellant (original defendant) challenging the judgment and order dated 17th February 2023 p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation to Protect Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's commercial allotment of land earmarked for sports complex quashed; State Government's decision to shift complex to remote location set aside.

1 Jul 2024

The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenging the action...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation Seeking Preservation of Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai — Directs Restoration of Earmarked Land and Cancellation of Allotment to Private Developer. Land reserved since 2003 under Government Resolution dated 26 March 2003 for a Government Sports Complex cannot be diverted for commercial purposes; shifting the complex to a remote rural area 115 km away is arbitrary.

1 Jul 2024

The Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, filed a Public Interest Litigation before the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of CID...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Father's Appeal in Child Custody Dispute, Restores Family Court's Order Granting Permanent Custody. The Court held that the High Court erred in substituting a shared custody arrangement without adequate consideration of the children's welfare under the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890.

8 May 2024

The case involves a custody dispute between a Colonel in the Indian Armed Forces (appellant) and his wife, a teacher (respondent), over their two mino...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Section 17(2)(viii) of Income Tax Act and Rule 3(7)(i) of Income Tax Rules in Bank Employee Loan Perquisite Case. Delegation of Power to Prescribe Fringe Benefits Held Not Excessive and Use of SBI Prime Lending Rate as Benchmark Upheld as Non-Arbitrary.

7 May 2024

The Supreme Court, in a common judgment, dismissed appeals filed by staff unions and officers' associations of various banks challenging the constitut...

High Court

KAHC010159832015_1

15 Dec 2017

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Challenging Appointment of Special Counsel in Customs and Excise Matters. Rule 9 of Customs (Appeals) Rules, 1982 and Rule 12 of Central Excise (Appeals) Rules, 2001 held not ultra vires.

19 Jan 2015

The petitioner, an advocate enrolled in the Karnataka State Bar Council, filed a Public Interest Litigation in 2014 challenging an endorsement dated 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Commercial Suit for Specific Performance — Defendant's Right to Challenge Maintainability Preserved. Amendment to incorporate subsequent events and alternative relief under Section 22 of Specific Relief Act, 1963, held permissible without prejudice to defendant's objections.

30 Nov -0001

The plaintiffs, Shashisumeet Production Pvt. Ltd. and others, filed a Commercial Suit No. 621 of 2017 seeking specific performance of an agreement for...

21 22 23 24 25

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)