Somanahalli Toll Plaza Case: Karnataka High Court Protects Local Residents from Daily Toll Charges.
28 Jan 2026The Karnataka High Court partly allowed a writ petition filed by residents of Somanahalli, Nelaguli and Kaggalipura villages challen...
Search Results for "Infrastructure Project"
909 result(s) found
Found 909 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition for Samruddhi Mahamarg Highway Project — Petitioners' Challenge to Notification Under Section 3D(2) of National Highways Act, 1956 Fails as Court Finds No Violation of Principles of Natural Justice or Arbitrariness. The court held that the declaration under Section 3D(2) is a ministerial act following the hearing under Section 3C, and no further hearing is required.
24 Dec 2025The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by landowners challenging the acquisition of their lands for the Samruddhi Mahamarg (Mumbai-Nagp...
- 214
High Court
- 33
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Tender Cancellation in Public Works Contract. Court holds that cancellation due to lack of competition and failure to meet essential conditions is valid and does not require prior notice to bidders.
20 Sep 2023The petitioner, Waterfront Constructions Private Limited, challenged the cancellation of a tender issued by the respondent authorities for a public wo...
- 70
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Companies Act Case Against Division Bench Order Restraining Property Transfer. Court Holds Section 339 of Companies Act, 2013 Applies Only to Directors, Managers, Officers or Persons Knowingly Party to Wrongful Trading of Company in Liquidation, Not to Unrelated Third Parties.
25 Jan 2023The appeal arose from a dispute concerning winding up proceedings against respondent No. 3 Company, which had launched the Festival City Mall project ...
- 234
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Awards for Irrigation Project — Petitioner's Title Not Established as Owner of Acquired Lands. Petitioner claiming tenancy cannot challenge acquisition without established title.
6 Jan 2023The petitioner, Ugar Sugar Works Limited, a public limited company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India chal...
- 60
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Part on Operational Creditor Status but Upholds Dismissal on Limitation in Insolvency Case. The court held that a purchaser does not qualify as an operational creditor under Section 5(20) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the application under Section 9 was barred by limitation due to debt arising from 2013 transactions.
4 Feb 2022The appeal arose from a dispute under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, involving the appellant, Consolidated Construction Consortium Limited,...
- 176
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Examines Scope of Section 34 Arbitration Act in National Highways Acquisition Disputes - The court considered whether modification of arbitral awards is permissible under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, particularly for compensation awards under the National Highways Act, 1956.
20 Jul 2021The Supreme Court addressed a significant legal question regarding the scope of judicial intervention under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concilia...
- 440
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Retired Secretary in PWD Corruption Case — Lack of Sanction Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act Renders Prosecution Invalid. FIR under IPC and PC Act for alleged irregularities in plot development quashed as prior sanction for prosecution of public servant was not obtained.
21 Apr 2020The petitioner, Deodutta Gangadhar Marathe, a retired Secretary (Works) of the Public Works Department (PWD) of Maharashtra, filed a writ petition see...
- 41
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Metro Construction Method as Withdrawn, Imposes Costs for Abuse of Process. Court finds the petition was filed with oblique motive to pressurize the developer for personal demands, not genuine public interest.
6 May 2011The petitioner, Dr. Monica Matani, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court complaining about the construction method ado...
- 88
