Search Results for "Income Tax Refund"

465 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 465 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issues Rule in Challenge to GST Demand Confirmation Order. Petition Challenges Order Confirming GST Demand of Rs 70.57 Crores for April 2020 to March 2021.

The petitioner, GlobeOp Financial Services (India) Private Limited (the surviving entity after its merger with GlobeOp Financial Services Technologies...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging CAT Order Denying Promotion from 2010. Petitioner's claim for promotion from 22 November 2010 rejected as he was not eligible on that date.

The petitioner, Chandrakant C. Mishra, a Tax Assistant (Group C) aged 61, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the order of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Unlawful Adjustment of Income Tax Refund Without Prior Intimation Under Section 245 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that adjustment of refund without prior intimation is illegal and directed refund with interest.

The petitioner, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, a public sector undertaking, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging TDS Deduction on Interest Component of Motor Accident Compensation. Interest on compensation under Motor Vehicles Act is not 'income' and TDS cannot be deducted under Income Tax Act.

The petitioner, Balkrishna Mhaske, through his wife Latabai, filed a writ petition challenging the deduction of Tax at Source (TDS) on the interest co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Adjustment of Refund Without Notice Under Section 245 of Income Tax Act, 1961. Refund for Assessment Year 2008-09 Adjusted Against Alleged Demands for 2014-15 and 2015-16 Without Prior Intimation to Assessee.

The petitioner, Greatship (India) Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the action of respondent No.2 (Centralised Processing Centre) in adjustin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Acquisition Order Under Section 269UD(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Amount Deposited with Interest as Acquisition Order Set Aside Due to Non-Compliance with Statutory Requirements.

The petitioner, M/s. Zeal Real Estate Limited (formerly Insat Leasing & Holding Limited), a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, entered ...