Search Results for "Income Tax Act 1922"

284 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 284 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Government Order Appointing Administrator for Vyasaraja Mutt. Petitioners Allege That the Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments Act, 1997 Does Not Apply to the Mutt and Seek Quashing of the Administrator's Appointment.

The case involved two writ petitions filed in the High Court of Karnataka challenging the Government orders dated 26.05.2012 appointing an administrat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Legal Metrology Case — Non-Compliance with Sampling Rules. Failure to Follow Section 29(6) of Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 and Rule 23 of Standards of Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Rules, 1985 Renders Seizure and Prosecution Invalid.

The applicants, Colgate-Palmolive (India) Ltd. and its Deputy Company Secretary, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Crimina...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal and Partly Allows Claimants' Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Negligence of Truck Driver Established, Contributory Negligence Not Proved. Claimants awarded enhanced compensation with 6% interest per annum from date of petition.

The judgment arises from two cross-appeals against the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sangli, dated 28 September 2005 in Claim Petition ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Overrules PV Narasimha Rao, Holds Bribery Not Protected by Parliamentary Privilege — Legislators Who Accept Bribes for Speech or Vote Are Not Immune from Prosecution Under Articles 105(2) and 194(2) of the Constitution.

The Supreme Court of India, in a seven-judge bench decision, overruled its earlier majority judgment in PV Narasimha Rao v. State (CBI/SPE) (1998) 4 S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Jurisdiction of Civil Court in Possession Dispute Involving Family Members. Section 33 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Held Not to Bar Suit as Tenancy Question Not Directly Arising.

The appeal before the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court arose from an order of a learned Single Judge deciding a preliminary issue of jurisdicti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Food Adulteration Case: Remand Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. High Court's order setting aside conviction and ordering retrial against company without notice violates Section 401(2) CrPC.

The Supreme Court allowed two appeals arising from a High Court order that set aside the conviction of a nominated officer of Hindustan Unilever Limit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Sets Aside MSME Facilitation Council Award for Lack of Jurisdiction — BSNL Not Liable for Interest Under MSMED Act as Council Had No Territorial Authority Over Dispute Arising from Contract with Chennai Seat of Arbitration.

The petitioner, M/s. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL), filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Partition Suit; Upholds Concurrent Findings That Properties Are Joint Family and Partition Deed Not Binding. Defendants Failed to Prove Self-Acquired Nature of Lands, and Partition Deed Invalid as Mother's Consent Not Obtained for Minors' Shares.

The dispute arose from a suit for partition filed by the widow and children of late Praveen Deshpande against his parents and brothers seeking one-six...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit, Sets Aside Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Court holds that plaintiff failed to prove title and possession, and that the suit was barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves two second appeals arising from a common judgment of the Additional Sub Judge, Chengalpattu, in A.S. No.12 of 2001, which modified t...