Search Results for "Demand draft"

1202 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1202 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shashikant Piraji Sonawane, was convicted by the Special Judge for Greater Bombay under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Examines Conviction of EPFO Official for Bribery Under Prevention of Corruption Act; Validity of Sanction and Proof of Demand Analyzed. Court Considers Whether Sanction Order Was Granted After Proper Application of Mind and Whether Accused Actually Demanded the Bribe.

The appellant, a former Senior Social Security Assistant in the Employees Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO), Regional Office, Bengaluru, was convicte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Endorsement Denying Compensation in Land Acquisition for National Highway — Payment Cannot Be Withheld Due to Title Dispute After Vesting. Competent Authority Must Deposit Disputed Amount Before Court Under Section 3G(5) of National Highways Act, 1956, Not Refuse Payment.

The petitioner, T. Younis @ Unees, a landowner, challenged two endorsements dated 20.05.2022 and 20.09.2022 issued by the Special Land Acquisition Off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Company Law Board's Power to Direct Issue of Shares Under Section 111 of Companies Act, 1956. The appeal raises the question whether the Board can order issuance of share certificates and rectification of register absent valid transfer documents.

This company appeal arose from an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) dated 14 January 2013 in Company Petition No. 23 of 2012. The CLB had directed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Income Tax Department to Comply with ITAT Order and Release Seized Jewellery and Refund Within Six Weeks. Failure to Complete Block Assessment Within Limitation Under Section 158BE of Income Tax Act, 1961 Renders Retention of Seized Assets Illegal.

The petitioner, legal heir of Late Mr. Lakhpatrai Agarwal, filed a writ petition challenging the inaction of the Income Tax Department in complying wi...