Search Results for "Composite Agreement"

537 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 537 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction to Plaintiff in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case. The court restrained the defendant from using deceptively similar 'PRINCE' and crown device marks for PVC pipes, finding a strong prima facie case of infringement and passing off.

The plaintiff, Prince Pipes and Fittings Ltd., a Mumbai-based company, has been using the mark 'PRINCE' and a 'crown device' since 1987 for manufactur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MHADA Order in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute. Court upholds MHADA's order directing petitioners to vacate and hand over possession of chawl rooms for redevelopment under Section 95A of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976.

The petitioners, who are residents of Mohamed Tajbhai Chawl in Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Apartmentalisation in Chandigarh Residential Plots to Preserve City's Original Character. Fragmentation of single dwelling units into multiple apartments violates Rule 16 of Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031.

The case involves a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Chandigarh Citizens Forum (appellants) against the Chandigarh Administration and others, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Intervention Application in Section 34 Arbitration Proceedings. Third Party Cannot Intervene in Section 34 Application Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as It Is a Summary Proceeding Between Award Debtor and Award Holder Only.

The petitioner, Luxury Lifeline, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 18/12/2017 passed by the Principal District Judge, Nagpur, rejecting...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Summary Judgment in Favor of Builder/Promoter in Summary Suit for Recovery of Maintenance Charges Under MOFA Agreement. Defendant's Failure to File Reply to Summons for Judgment Leads to Decree for Claimed Amount with Interest.

The plaintiff, Sai Om Petro Specialities Ltd., a builder/promoter, filed a summary suit against the defendant, M Industries, for recovery of alleged m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment for Recovery of Maintenance Charges Under MOFA Agreement. Builder/Promoter entitled to recover proportionate outgoings from purchaser based on contractual clause in agreement for sale.

The plaintiff, Sai Om Petro Specialities Ltd., a builder/promoter, filed a summary suit against the defendant, M Industries through its proprietor Mr....