Search Results for "Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948"

298 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 298 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title and Possession.

The case involves a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arising from a suit for declaration of ownership and injunct...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Revenue Dispute — Finds No Error in Revenue Authority's Order Based on Prior Civil Court Decree. Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title and Petition Barred by Delay and Laches.

The petitioners, legal heirs of Laxman Shankar Bandgar, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Deputy Collector (Land Reforms), Latur, dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act in Property Development Dispute. Petitioners Argue Award is Unreasoned and Arbitrator Failed to Independently Analyze Submissions, Seeking Set Aside.

Background: The matter involved a property development dispute concerning three tribal (Adivasi) lands in Malad, Mumbai. The petitioners were legal he...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Ownership in Favor of Daughter. Claim of adverse possession by brother against sister fails as co-owner must prove ouster or denial of title.

The dispute pertains to agricultural lands and a house situated at Village Dhokawade, Taluka Alibaug, District Raigad, originally owned by Narayan Hir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Mutation Entries in Land Revenue Records — No Substantial Question of Law Arises Under Article 227 of Constitution of India. Mutation entries are summary in nature and do not confer title; disputes regarding title must be resolved by a civil court.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging mutation entries made in the revenue reco...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellants' Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings That Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession. Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits Dismissed as Plaintiffs Did Not Discharge Burden of Proof Under Section 100 CPC.

The case involves two second appeals arising from a property dispute between the legal representatives of Balaji Ramaiya Manthanwar (appellants) and G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. No Substantial Question of Law Arises as Courts Below Concurrently Held That Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Land.

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for declaration of title and possession over agricultural land. The trial court dismissed the suit, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Upholds Prior Partition Based on Unequal Division and Subsequent Conduct. Court holds that unequal partition does not invalidate severance of joint status and that subsequent alienations of individual shares indicate acceptance of prior partition.

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by the original defendants against a decree for partition and separate possession granted by the First Appella...