Search Results for "Asset Recovery"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Asset Recovery"

483 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 483 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Commercial Suit and Interim Application in Asset Reconstruction Dispute — Upholds Validity of Assignment of Debt and Security Interest. Court holds that an Asset Reconstruction Company (ARC) is entitled to enforce security interest under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act) after valid assignment of debt.

15 Apr 2026

The Applicant, Phoenix ARC Private Limited, an Asset Reconstruction Company registered with the RBI, filed a Commercial Suit (COMSS No. 124 of 2025) a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Insolvency Case — Petition Under Section 7 IBC Held Time-Barred Despite IRP's Admission of Claim Not Constituting Acknowledgment Under Limitation Act. The Court held that limitation for Section 7 IBC runs from NPA date, and IRP's admission of claim is administrative, not an acknowledgment under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

27 Mar 2026

The appeals under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) were filed by Appellant, erstwhile Director of two corporate debtors, a...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Application for Rejection of Plaint in Commercial Summary Suit Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Exemption from Pre-Institution Mediation Under Section 12A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Upheld as Suit Contemplated Urgent Interim Relief Based on Plaintiff's Apprehension of Asset Disposal to Defeat Claim.

4 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from a commercial summary suit filed by  Respondents, a non-banking financial company, against Applicants for recovery of appro...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Disqualifying Related Parties of Corporate Debtors from Submitting Resolution Plans. The Court holds that the disqualification under Section 29A(c) applies to persons acting jointly or in concert with a disqualified person, and that the provision is not retrospective in operation.

3 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment on the interpretation and validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets Section 29A(h) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Regarding Guarantor Eligibility. The court held that a person who has executed an enforceable guarantee is not disqualified from submitting a resolution plan unless the guarantee has been invoked, as liability crystallizes upon invocation under the amended provisions.

18 Jan 2022

The Supreme Court was called upon to interpret Section 29A(h) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as amended, concerning the eligibility of a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal to Credit Amount Paid Under Income Declaration Scheme in Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act Proceedings. Court Holds That Beneficial Legislation Must Be Interpreted Liberally and Non Obstante Clause Does Not Bar Credit for Prior Payments Under Earlier Scheme.

11 Aug 2021

The petitioner, Pinnacle Vastunirman Private Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the refusal of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2 (res...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRAT Order Setting Aside DRT's Reference to Arbitration in Bank Recovery Suit. Debt Recovery Tribunal Has Exclusive Jurisdiction Under RDDB Act, 1993, and Arbitration Clause Cannot Oust It.

8 Mar 2016

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by Harvestdeal Securities Ltd. challenging an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRA...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Blacklisting Order Against Contractor in ONGC Contract Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice as Show Cause Notice Did Not Specify Proposed Penalty. Show Cause Notice Must Clearly Indicate Intended Action of Blacklisting to Afford Meaningful Opportunity of Hearing Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

2 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Anchor Offshore Services Ltd (Anchor), a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, challenged a blacklisting order dated 5th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Writ Petitions Against Labour Court Orders in Recovery Proceedings Under Section 33C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Held That Assignee Bank Steps Into Shoes of Transferor and Is Liable for Pre-Transfer Claims of Workmen.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, the Authorized Officer and Chairman & Managing Director of IDBI Bank (Stressed Assets Stabilization Fund), filed four writ petitions ...

Tribunals

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal of Personal Guarantor Against Initiation of Insolvency Resolution Process Under IBC. The Tribunal held that the Adjudicating Authority correctly admitted the application under Section 95 of the IBC as the debt was due and default occurred, and the personal guarantor's objections regarding limitation and pending proceedings were not sustainable.

30 Nov -0001

The appeal was filed by Mahdoom Bava Bahrudeen Noorul Ameen (Appellant) under Section 61(3) read with Section 61(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy C...

21 22 23 24 25

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)