Search Results for "ACB investigation"

356 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 356 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Invalid Sanction. Sanction Granted by Sub-Divisional Officer Instead of Collector Held Incompetent, Despite Satisfactory Evidence of Demand and Acceptance.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Anti-Corruption Bureau, Satara, appealed against the acquittal of Ramdas Bhagwan Vairat, a Talathi (village reve...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Devidas s/o Harichandra Bhaskar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon on 26-11-2015 in Special (A.C.B.) Case No.13 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in CBI Corruption Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Criminal Appeal Allowed Against Conviction Under Sections 409 and 477A IPC for Alleged Misappropriation of Rs. 2912.70 by Double Entries in Cash Book.

The appellant, Madhukar s/o Maroti Chandekar, was convicted by the Special Court for CBI (ACB) in Special Case No.11/1992 (renumbered as 6/2003) for o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Vitiated Sanction and Inconsistent Evidence. Sanction under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 found to be without application of mind, and prosecution evidence on demand and acceptance of bribe was mutually inconsistent.

The appellant, Ravindra s/o Marotrao Thakre, was convicted by the Special Court under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for offences under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in SC/ST Atrocities Case Due to False Complaint and Lack of Public View Element. The court held that the complaint was retaliatory and the essential ingredient of public view under Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Act was not satisfied.

The applicant, Dr. Yogesh Shankarlal Gupta, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Purushottam Vasant Joshi, was a Maintenance Supervisor in the Taluka Inspector of Land Records office at Miraj. He was convicted by the...