Encroachment on B-Kharab Land: Key Judgment Every Property Owner Must Know.
6 Feb 2026The writ petitions were filed challenging action of BBMP alleging construction over a storm water drain and seeking protection from demolition –...
Search Results for "third party obstruction"
221 result(s) found
Found 221 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Intervention in SARFAESI Proceedings, Remands for Fresh Hearing on Tenancy Issue. The court held that the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate has jurisdiction to decide tenancy claims under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961, and cannot relegate the issue to the Debt Recovery Tribunal without proper consideration.
22 Feb 2018The petitioner, Amit Mohan Bhatia, claiming to be a tenant of secured assets under an Agreement of Tenancy dated 30 March 2000, filed an intervention ...
- 20
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition Against Bank's Possession in SARFAESI Proceedings — Tenancy Dispute Must Be Adjudicated by DRT, Not Magistrate Under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act.
22 Feb 2018The petitioner, Amit Mohan Bhatia, claiming to be a tenant of a property secured by Maratha Sahkari Bank Ltd., filed an intervention application befor...
- 28
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition Challenging Eviction in SARFAESI Proceedings — Tenancy Agreement Found Not Genuine and Not Binding on Bank. The court upheld the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate's order allowing the bank to take possession of secured assets under Rule 107(11)(vi)(a) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961, as the tenant failed to prove a bonafide tenancy prior to the mortgage.
22 Feb 2018The petitioner, Amit Mohan Bhatia, claiming to be a tenant of a property attached by Maratha Sahkari Bank Ltd., filed an intervention application (Exh...
- 13
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Police Recruitment Selection Process — No Merit in Allegations of Irregularities in Physical Endurance Test and Viva Voce. Court Held That Selection Process Was Conducted Fairly and in Accordance with Rules, and Petitioner Failed to Establish Any Malafides or Violation of Principles of Natural Justice.
28 Sep 2017The petitioner, Sushant Suresh Salvi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the selection process for the p...
- 42
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Driver for Parking Without Indicators Established. The court upheld the Tribunal's award of compensation to the parents of the deceased, finding no perversity in the finding of negligence against the driver of the offending lorry.
11 Nov 2016The appeal was filed by United India Insurance Company Limited challenging the judgment and award dated 30.04.2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims...
- 25
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Conviction for Cheque Bounce Set Aside Due to Failure to Prove Debt Legally Enforceable. The court held that the complainant failed to establish the existence of a legally enforceable debt, as the loan was advanced to a third party and not to the accused.
15 Apr 2015The petitioner, S K Chand Basha, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for dishonour of a cheque. The complainant, S...
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Terrace Rights and Parking — Declares Plaintiff's Right to Use Terrace as Common Area and Parking Space Based on Sale Deed. The court interpreted the sale deed to grant the plaintiff a car parking space and terrace rights, reversing the trial court's partial decree.
17 Mar 2015The appellant, Ms. Sandra Lesley Ann Bartels, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment...
- 31
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Terrace Rights and Common Areas — Holds That Terrace Is Part of Common Areas and Cannot Be Exclusively Used by Any One Owner Without Consent of All Owners. The court set aside the trial court's decree which had declared that the plaintiff had no right over the terrace and granted permanent injunction against the plaintiff.
17 Mar 2015The appellant, Ms. Sandra Lesley Ann Bartels, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment...
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Easement Right of Way Dispute — Non-Existence of Government Road or Prescriptive Right Bars Claim Over Plaintiff's Land. The court held that in the absence of any existing right of way or documentary proof from revenue department, the defendants cannot claim easement by prescription over the plaintiffs' field survey no. 28.
3 Mar 2014The case involves a second appeal before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, arising from a suit for injunction filed by the appellants (plaintiffs) ...
- 268
