Search Results for "licensee protection"

403 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 403 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Petition Challenging Inspection Order Under Section 28 of Maharashtra Rent Act. Landlord's Application for Measurement of Tenanted Premises Allowed to Ascertain Area for Reconstruction Undertaking Under Section 16(6)(d).

The petitioners, tenants of suit premises, challenged an order passed by the Judge, Small Causes Court, Bombay, allowing the respondent landlord's app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in IBC Section 7 Application — Cumulative Redeemable Preference Shares Held as Debt, Not Investment. The Court held that CRPS constitute a debt under Section 3(11) of IBC, 2016, and the appellant is a financial creditor entitled to file an application under Section 7.

The appeal arises from the dismissal of the appellant's application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) by the NCLT and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in National Highways Act Land Acquisition Cases — Section 3J Not Violative of Article 14. The Court held that the non-grant of solatium and interest under the National Highways Act, 1956 is not discriminatory and the Act is a complete code.

The Supreme Court, in a batch of appeals filed by the Union of India, considered the validity of the non-grant of solatium and interest under the Nati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Insolvency Case Due to Lack of Financial Creditor Status. Interest-Free Term Loan Does Not Qualify as Financial Debt Under Section 5(8) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 as It Lacks Consideration for Time Value of Money.

The appeal arose under Section 62 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) against the dismissal by the National Company Law Appellate Tribun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 — Presumption Under Section 55 Not Rebutted. Landlord Failed to Produce Written Agreement or Rebut Presumption of Tenancy, Leading to Setting Aside of Eviction Order.

The petitioner, Prakash Ghevarchand Kothari, challenged the eviction order passed by the competent authority under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Rejection of Plaint in Trust Dispute for Non-Compliance with Section 50 of Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950. Suit by devotees challenging removal of deity held barred without Charity Commissioner's consent.

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by defendant trustees (defendant Nos. 1, 3, 4, and 5) in a suit seeking rejection of the plaint under Order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Hears Civil Revision Applications Against Appellate Order Upholding Obstructionist Right to Occupy Shops on Leased Land. Eviction Decree Against Tenants Did Not Automatically Extinguish Obstructionists' Possession Under Bombay Rent Act and Maharashtra Rent Control Act.

These Civil Revision Applications were filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 challenging the common judgment and order dated 4 ...