Search Results for "containers"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "containers"

232 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 232 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Upholds Seizure of Industrial Oil by DRI Under Section 110 of Customs Act, 1962 — DRI Has Power to Seize Goods Even After Clearance for Home Consumption. The court held that the power of seizure under Section 110 is independent of assessment and can be exercised by DRI officers as proper officers.

9 Mar 2026

The judgment concerns a batch of writ petitions filed by importers of industrial oil challenging the seizure of their goods by the Directorate of Reve...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Reverses Acquittal Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Under Section 139 N.I. Act Not Rebutted by Accused.

31 Jan 2019

The appellant, M/s. Ajmera Housing Corporation, a partnership firm, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, again...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Denial of Right to Re-Analysis. Accused Acquitted as Sample Became Unfit for Analysis Under Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

6 Mar 2018

The State of Maharashtra filed three appeals against the acquittal of the accused Harishchandra Sadhuram Agarwal, a vendor and proprietor of a kirana ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cross-Examination in Customs Show Cause Proceedings - Right to Cross-Examine Witnesses Whose Statements Are Relied Upon Is a Fundamental Principle of Natural Justice

1 Mar 2018

The petitioner, Kalpena Industries Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in manufacturing polyethylene/polypropylene ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Company Officials in Insecticide Act Case Due to Non-Joinder of Manufacturing Company and Expiry of Sample Shelf Life. The court held that without the company being arraigned as an accused, vicarious liability cannot be imposed on its officers, and the expiry of the sample's shelf life deprived the accused of their statutory right to get the sample tested from a third laboratory under Section 24(3) of the Insecticides Act, 1968.

22 Jan 2018

The petitioners, accused Nos. 2 and 3 in R.C.C. No. 479/2015 pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Parbhani, filed a criminal writ petition un...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Petition for Interim Maintenance in Divorce Proceedings — Husband's Earning Capacity Assessed at ₹2 Lakhs per Month. The court directed the husband to pay ₹15,000 per month as interim maintenance under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, considering the wife's dire straits and the husband's income.

12 Oct 2017

The petitioner, Mrs. Susan Thereza Pinto alias Susan Cardeiro, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challengi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Rules. Acquittal of Vendor for Selling Adulterated Groundnut Oil Upheld as Sample Not Representative and Rules 14 and 16 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Not Followed.

24 Aug 2017

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bramhapuri, in Regular Criminal Case No.68 of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act for Selling Adulterated Groundnut Oil. Conviction and Sentence of 3 Months RI and Fine of Rs.1000 Upheld as Concurrent Findings of Fact Cannot Be Disturbed in Revision.

7 Aug 2017

The applicant, Santoshkumar Ramchandra Rathi, was convicted by the Chief Judicial Magistrate First Class, Wardha, on 17.9.1999 in Regular Criminal Cas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Design Infringement and Passing Off Case — Cello's PURO Bottle Design Held Prima Facie Novel and Original, Modware's Product Found Indistinguishable. The court found that the defendants' bottle was identical in shape, configuration, and surface ornamentation to the plaintiffs' registered design under the Designs Act, 2000, and that the packaging was also deceptively similar, warranting interim relief.

30 Mar 2017

The plaintiffs, Cello Household Products and Cello Plastic Industrial Works, filed a suit for design infringement and passing off against Modware Indi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Motion in Trade Mark Infringement Case Involving Use of Registered Mark as Corporate Name for Dissimilar Goods. The Full Bench overruled Raymond Ltd v Raymond Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd and held that Section 29(5) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 provides a separate cause of action for infringement when a registered trade mark is used as a corporate or trading name, even for dissimilar goods.

1 Mar 2017

The case involves a Notice of Motion in a suit filed by CIPLA Limited against M/s. CIPLA Industries Private Limited and Vishal Khanna for alleged infr...

20 21 22 23 24

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)