Search Results for "compelled testimony"

352 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 352 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Order for Disclosure and Restraint Pending Suit on Foreign Judgments. The Order Directs Disclosure of Assets and Restraint on Alienation, Drawing Challenge Under Section 13 CPC and Execution Principles.

The appeal arises from an order dated 5 May 2026 passed by the Single Judge in an interim application in a suit filed by the respondents on 24 April 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Husband in Dowry Death Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declarations and Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Sections 498-A and 306 IPC Set Aside as Dying Declarations Were Undated, Not Read Over, and Recorded in Marathi While Deceased Knew Only Urdu.

The appellant, Mohammad Ejaz, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, for offences under Sections 498-A (cruelty by husband) and 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Lack of Instigation — Conviction Under Sections 306 and 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Direct Instigation or Active Participation.

The appellants, Santosh Sakharam Kamble and Milind Devaji Kamble, were convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri in Sessions Case ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Informant's appeal under Section 372 Cr.P.C. fails as prosecution could not prove homicidal death or involvement of accused beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Samadhan Ramrao Ghanghav, the brother of the deceased Santosh, filed an appeal under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 197...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court Order Returning Plaint for Want of Pecuniary Jurisdiction in Suit for Injunction and Damages. The Court Held That for Order VII Rule 11 CPC, Only Plaint Averments Are Relevant, Not Evidence.

The appellant, Bharat Bhushan Gupta, filed a suit for mandatory and prohibitory injunction and recovery of damages against the respondents, Pratap Nar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Metro Fare Hike; Judicial Review Not Permitted Over Specialist Committee's Decision Under Metro Act. Fare Fixation Committee's Determination Based on Section 34 Prevails Over Contractual Fare Stipulations, Limited to Checking Arbitrariness or Perversity.

The writ petition challenged the Fare Fixation Committee's decision to increase Mumbai Metro fares from Rs.9-13 to Rs.10-110 from January 2015. The pe...