Search Results for "child definition"

587 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 587 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation for Injured Motorcyclist in Motor Accident Claim — Tribunal's Award of Rs.10,44,212/- Modified to Rs.25,00,000/- with 9% Interest. Future Loss of Income Recalculated Based on Notional Income of Rs.4,500/- per Month and 40% Disability.

The appellant, Ambala Muljibhai Makwana (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), was driving a motor cycle on 18.01.2003 when a tanker bearing re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Husband’s Appeal Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Setting Aside Family Court’s Dismissal of Divorce Petition. Wild Allegations Including Terrorist Links Against Police Constable Constitute Mental Cruelty, Making Marital Relationship Unworkable.

The husband, employed as a police constable, filed a divorce petition before the Family Court, Sivagangai, under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes SC/ST Act Charges Against Accused in Private Altercation — Insult Not in Public View. Alleged Caste-Based Insult Occurred Inside a Shop, Not in Public View, Failing to Attract Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The petitioners, Bhimappa Jantakal @ Bhimanna and three others, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault and Kidnapping of Minor Girl. Victim's Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Offences Under Sections 5(1) and 6 of POCSO Act and Sections 363, 366A, 376 of IPC.

The appellant, Rupesh Parasram Nehare, was convicted by the Special Judge, Warora in Special (POCSO) Case No. 05 of 2015 for offences under Section 5(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Child Sexual Abuse Case Due to Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 509 IPC and Goa Children's Act, 2003 set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves two appeals filed by Suraj Nadkarni (Appellant No.1) and Dilesh Sambari (Appellant No.2) against their conviction by the Children's ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws in Dowry Case Due to Vague Allegations. Lack of Specific Overt Acts Against Mother-in-Law and Sister-in-Law Leads to Quashing of FIR Under Sections 498-A, 323 IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

The petitioners, being the mother-in-law (petitioner no.2) and sister-in-law (petitioner no.3) of the respondent no.2 (complainant), sought quashing o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws in Dowry Case Due to Vague Allegations. FIR and Charge-Sheet Lacked Specific Instances of Dowry Demand or Cruelty Under Sections 498A, 323 IPC and Section 4 Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

The petitioners, who are the husband (petitioner no.1) and his parents (petitioners 2 and 3), filed a criminal writ petition seeking quashing of FIR N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Public View Element. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred in Private Setting, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The petitioners, Bapu Ladkat, Suresh Supekar, and Devidas Bhople, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 482...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Appeal for Divorce on Grounds of Cruelty and Desertion Under Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Allegations of Cruelty Were Vague and Desertion Not Proven, Affirming Family Court's Dismissal of Divorce Petition.

The appellant-husband filed a petition under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, challenging the Family Court, Pune's order dated 18 July 2000...