Search Results for "asset reconstruction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "asset reconstruction"

366 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 366 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Bank to Refer MSME Loan Account for Restructuring Under RBI Framework - Petitioner's MSME Status Entitles It to Benefit of Framework for Revival and Rehabilitation. The court held that the bank was obligated to refer the stressed MSME account to the Committee for restructuring as per the Government Notification dated 29.05.2015 and RBI Master Direction dated 21.07.2016, following the Supreme Court's decision in Pro Knits.

29 Jan 2026

The petitioners, Vardhan Agro Processing Limited (petitioner No.1, an MSME) and its chairman and shareholder (petitioner No.2), filed a writ petition ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Bench Allows Bank's Petition, Holds Secured Creditor's Charge Prevails Over State's Statutory First Charge Under MVAT Act and Profession Tax Act. The court ruled that Section 26E of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 gives priority to the secured creditor over all other debts, including statutory dues of the State, and that the non-obstante clause in the SARFAESI Act overrides the provisions of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 and the Profession Tax Act, 1975.

17 Dec 2021

The petitioner, Union Bank of India, had sanctioned cash credit and inland letter of credit facilities of Rs.10 crores to respondent No.4, M/s. Linkso...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in IBC Limitation Case, Holds Section 7 Application Time-Barred Under Article 137 of Limitation Act. The Court ruled that Article 62 of Limitation Act applies only to suits, not to applications under Section 7 of IBC, and time-barred debts cannot be revived under the Code.

18 Sep 2019

The case involves an appeal against the judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) which had dismissed the appellant's appeal and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Admission of Winding Up Petition Due to Company's Ability to Secure Debt. Section 434(1)(a) of Companies Act, 1956 Requires Creditor to Consider Offer of Security Before Deeming Company Unable to Pay Debts.

7 Sep 2018

The appeal was filed by Stonemann Royale Limited against an order dated 19 March 2018 made by the learned Company Judge admitting and ordering adverti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Interim Relief in SARFAESI Act Case — Civil Suit Held Not Maintainable Due to Bar Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act. Borrowers Must Avail Remedy Under Section 17 Before DRT Instead of Seeking Injunction in Civil Court.

27 Sep 2016

The case involves an appeal filed by the appellants, who are borrowers and guarantors, against an order of the Commercial Division of the Bombay High ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order in SARFAESI Act Case — Petitioner Failed to Show Any Error in DRT's Refusal to Set Aside Auction Sale. Court Held That DRT's Order Was Not Without Jurisdiction and That the Petitioner Had an Alternative Remedy of Appeal Under Section 18 of SARFAESI Act.

19 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Asset Reconstruction Company (India) Limited, acting as trustee of Arcil-SBPS-024-I Trust, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of ...

High Court

High Court Sets Aside Company Judge's Order Restricting Disposition of Property in Winding Up Petition — Observations Held Unwarranted and Prejudicial to Third Party Rights Under Companies Act. The court held that at the acceptance stage of a winding up petition, drastic observations regarding disposition of property and transfer of shares should not be made without affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing, and that such observations affect the rights of third parties under the Companies Act, 1956.

25 Sep 2014

The appeal arose from an order of the learned Company Judge placing a winding up petition for acceptance at a future date, but with a concluding parag...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Claims for Damages Against Plaintiff for Wrongful Arrest of Cargo in Admiralty Suit — Undertaking Under Rule 941 of Bombay High Court (OS) Rules Not Enforceable After Suit Withdrawal Without Adjudication on Merits.

20 Feb 2014

The Plaintiff, Navbharat International Ltd., filed an admiralty suit and obtained an ex-parte order dated 12th January 2010 for arrest of cargo on boa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up Petition Against Company for Failure to Repay Convertible Bonds — Debt Admitted and Company Unable to Pay Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956. The court held that where a debt is admitted and the company is commercially insolvent, a winding up order is justified.

30 Jul 2013

The Bank of New York Mellon, London Branch, as trustee for bondholders, filed a winding up petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 ag...

Tribunals

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal of Personal Guarantor Against Initiation of Insolvency Resolution Process Under IBC. The Tribunal held that the Adjudicating Authority correctly admitted the application under Section 95 of the IBC as the debt was due and default occurred, and the personal guarantor's objections regarding limitation and pending proceedings were not sustainable.

30 Nov -0001

The appeal was filed by Mahdoom Bava Bahrudeen Noorul Ameen (Appellant) under Section 61(3) read with Section 61(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy C...

20 21 22 23 24

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)