Search Results for "adjudicatory power"

448 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 448 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal to Enforce English Summary Judgment in Guarantee Dispute — Foreign Judgment Held Unenforceable for Violating Principles of Natural Justice Under Section 13 CPC. Summary judgment passed after denying leave to defend is not conclusive and cannot be enforced in India.

The dispute arose from a Share Purchase and Co-operation Agreement (SPCA) executed on 12.05.1995 between (appellant, a foreign company) and (responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Public Servants in Defamation Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 199 CrPC. Private Complaint for Defamation Against Public Servant Requires Prior Sanction from Competent Authority.

The judgment pertains to four criminal applications filed by Vinod Sahebrao Pandhare, Santosh B. Somani, Bharat Dnyandeo Deogire, and Ashok Narayan Ga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Rejects Recusal Plea in Land Acquisition Reference. Judge Who Decided Smaller Bench Can Sit in Larger Bench to Reconsider Same Issue as Bias Plea Based on Extrajudicial Factors.

This order arises from a reference to a five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court of India concerning the interpretation of Section 24 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Section 21(5) of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1989 Allowing Non-Judicial Member as President of Tribunal. Challenge to Appointment of IAS Officer as President Dismissed as Provision Does Not Violate Basic Structure.

The Sales Tax Tribunal Bar Association and its President filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Deduction of Rs.90/MT by Karnataka Power Corporation Limited from Coal Bills — Contractual Dispute Not Amenable to Writ Jurisdiction Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioners, M/s. EMTA Coal Limited and M/s. Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitutio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions in Coal Supply Contract Dispute — Contractual Dispute Not Amenable to Writ Jurisdiction. Deduction of Rs.90/MT by Karnataka Power Corporation Limited from Coal Bills Challenged, but Court Holds Alternative Remedy of Arbitration Available.

The petitioners, M/s. EMTA Coal Limited and M/s. Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitutio...