Search Results for "Section 363"

867 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 867 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Identification. Conviction under Sections 364-A, 363, 365 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand of ransom and identity of accused beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the kidnapping of a nine-year-old boy, Deepak, son of Mohanlal Oswal (PW1), on 30th June 1994 at about 7:30 p.m. from near his ho...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC. Minor's Age Proved by School Leaving Certificate and Oral Evidence, Consent Irrelevant for Rape Under Indian Penal Code.

The case arose from a criminal appeal filed by the appellant-accused challenging his conviction and sentence for offences under Sections 363, 366, and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Accused in POCSO Case Due to Lack of Medical Evidence and Non-Examination of Material Witness. Conviction under Sections 363, 377 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove penetrative sexual assault beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dilip Jaglal Warkhede, was convicted by the Special Judge (POCSO Act) and Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Special Criminal Case No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dacoity and Murder Case Due to Lack of Identification and Insufficient Evidence. Conviction under Sections 363, 396 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove appellant's involvement beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Arjun Ganpat Sandbhor, was convicted by the learned Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge-1, Malegaon, for offences under Section 363 read w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals and Upholds Conviction in Gang Rape Case Under Sections 363 and 376(D) IPC. DNA Analysis of Undergarment Stains Proved Guilt of All Four Accused, Trivializing Contradictions in Victim’s Narration and Test Identification Failures.

Background: The appeals arose from the conviction of four men by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhandara, in Special Criminal (Child) Case No. 14 of 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault and Kidnapping of Minor Girl. Victim's Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Offences Under Sections 5(1) and 6 of POCSO Act and Sections 363, 366A, 376 of IPC.

The appellant, Rupesh Parasram Nehare, was convicted by the Special Judge, Warora in Special (POCSO) Case No. 05 of 2015 for offences under Section 5(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Zabarsingh Pilya Bhilala, was convicted by the IIIrd Ad hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Achalpur in Sessions Trial 80/1997 for offences u...