Search Results for "Section 33(3)"

418 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 418 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Partition Suit for Coparcenary Property Based on Pre-1956 Female Succession. Widow's acquisition of property under Hindu Women's Right to Property Act, 1937 is not a coparcenary asset but her absolute estate under Section 14(1) of Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 28.08.2019 in O.S. No. 101/2015 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge and CJM, Bagalkot, partl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Attachment Notices Against Third-Party Purchaser for Excise Dues of Defaulter. Central Excise Cannot Attach Property Sold Prior to Creation of Dues Without Notice to Purchaser Under Section 11 of Central Excise Act, 1944.

The Petitioner, M/s Runwal Constructions, a partnership firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, engaged in construction and developmen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for Murder of Wife Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Chain of Circumstances.

The appellant, Ramesh Nandu Surun, was convicted by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, for the murder of his wife Sita Surum under Section 302 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision in POCSO Case — Probation Report Can Be Called Even Under POCSO Act. Section 4(1)(2) of Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 is Not Barred by POCSO Act, 2012.

The applicant, Nishant Harishchandra Salvi, was prosecuted for offences punishable under Section 354A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8 of the Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Waiver of Interest Under Sections 234A, 234B, 234C of Income Tax Act, 1961. Petitioner failed to deposit unutilized capital gains in specified account, leading to levy of interest.

The petitioner, Humayun Suleman Merchant, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 5th October 2004 passed by the Chief Commissioner of Incom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions by Cable Operators Challenging Denial of Compounding Option Under Entertainment Tax Laws. The court upheld the amendments to Rule 41-G and Section 4D as valid and non-discriminatory, rejecting claims of violation of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 300A.

The petitioners, M/s Hathway Krishna Cable (P) Limited and Hathway Cable & Datacom Pvt. Limited, are Multi System Operators (MSOs) providing cable tel...