Search Results for "MPDA Act, 1981"

248 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 248 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in MPDA Act Case Due to Non-Supply of Legible Documents. Failure to Provide Legible Copies of Statements and In-Camera Statements Violates Detenu's Right to Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Avhdut Narayn Shendge, filed a writ petition challenging an order of preventive detention dated 29th January 2026 passed by the Distri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in MPDA Act Case Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Evidence Linking Detenu to Offences. Detenu's Name Not in FIRs and In-camera Statements Not Verified by Competent Authority.

The petitioner, Santosh Subhash Koli, through his mother Sunandabai Subhash Koli, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the detention order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Compelling Necessity and Proximate Link. The court held that the detaining authority failed to consider alternative remedies like cancellation of bail and there was unexplained delay, vitiating the order.

The petitioner, Aniket Balaji Suryawanshi, challenged an order dated 25.10.2023 passed by the District Magistrate, Hingoli, detaining him under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Public Order Impact — Single Offence and In-Camera Statements Insufficient to Justify Preventive Detention

The petitioner, Ram @ Pappu Arun Kore, challenged a detention order dated 27th April 2022 issued by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur, under the Mah...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Communication of Grounds in Language Known to Detenu — Violation of Article 22(5) of Constitution of India. Detenu Who Knew Only Urdu Was Served Grounds in English and Hindi, Rendering Representation Right Illusory.

The petitioner, Abubakar @ Bagla Rais Ansari, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Boot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Discrepancy in Dates. Discrepancy between date of detention order (02/02/2012) and grounds of detention (03/02/2012) shows subjective satisfaction recorded after order, vitiating detention.

The petitioner, Iqbal Sikandar Pathan, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Orders Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Subjective Satisfaction. Preventive Detention Orders Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Petitioners' Custody Status and Relied on Unverified In-Camera Statements.

The petitioners, Pravin Nivrutti Pagare, Sunil Mahadeo Khandagale, and Vijay Premnath Gosavi, were detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prev...